Ugliest Dog contest: 'Mugly' had the name, now he gets the prize

Ugliest Dog contest: Eight-year-old rescue dog 'Mugly' was declared the World’s Ugliest Dog at an annual competition in Petaluma, Calif., making him the latest Chinese crested to get the top prize. 

The Press Democrat, Beth Schlanker/AP
Mugly, a Chinese crested dog owned by Bev Nicholson of Peterborough, England, won the title of 'World's Ugliest Dog' at the Sonoma-Marin Fair in Petaluma, Calif., Friday.

Mugly, a Chinese crested dog, bested 28 other contestants at the annual competition for the World’s Ugliest Dog in Petaluma, Calif., making him the latest Chinese crested to win the top prize.  

Judged for their “natural ugliness in both pedigree and mutt classes,” Princess Abby, Handsome Hector, and Creature were not able to top the sheer unattractiveness of Mugly, with his short snout, beady eyes, and white whiskers.

Bev Nicholson, Mugly's owner who rescued him in the streets in the United Kingdom after the dog was abandoned by his family, told the Associated Press, "I couldn't speak when they announced Mugly's name.

"I didn't know which way to look," she said. "I was shaking as much as the dog."

Mugly’s ugliness has long been recognized. In 2005, he was awarded the title of Britain’s ugliest dog. His looks do not, however, prevent him from holding down a job as a therapy dog for children. 

In addition to competing for international recognition, the British dog won a $1,000 prize and a year’s worth of dog cookies. He will also be invited for a photo shoot and a VIP stay at the local Sheraton. 

Last year’s winner at the Sonoma-Marin Fairgrounds, Yoda, was a Chinese crested and Chihuahua mix. Since the contest began in 2000, most of the winning dogs have been Chinese crested or Chinese crested and Chihuahua mixes. 

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.