With storms like Sandy, it's the flooding, not the wind, that gets you

Flooding from surges in storms like like Sandy, which struck the US East Coast a year ago, causes more fatalities than wind or rain. Yet the official hurricane category system fails to convey the threat of flooding, say researchers.

NASA GOES East, Stuart Rankin via Flickr
A view of Hurricane Sandy from GOES East satellite on Sunday, Oct. 27, 2012.

By the time Hurricane Sandy hit the northeast coast of the United States one year ago, it had weakened in wind speed from a Category 3 to a Category 1 storm. But people living in the storm's path quickly learned that this lower rating said little about the storm's destructive capacity.

By landfall, wind speeds had fallen below 94 mph (153 km/h) — the cutoff for Category 1 hurricanes — but the storm surge (the water that a storm pushes in front of itself above predicted tide levels) was greater than any other surge recorded in New York City's history, reaching up to 14 feet (4.3 meters) in lower Manhattan. Many of the 150 deaths associated with Sandy have been attributed to flooding from this surge along the New York and New Jersey coastlines.

This outcome was not unique to Hurricane Sandy: Flooding from storm surge has caused more deaths during hurricanes than any other hurricane threats — such as winds and freshwater flooding from rainfall — combined since 1900, according to the National Hurricane Center (NHC). And yet the NHC's official hurricane category system — meant to efficiently warn residents of a storm's destructive capacity — does not convey the threat of flooding.  [Hurricane Sandy: Photos of a Frankenstorm]

Winds and water

This is because the official Saffir-Simpson Hurricane Scale is based entirely on a storm's wind speed, which, it turns out, has little to do with the surge it produces. 

"There is no relationship," James Brinkley, a member of the National Hurricane Center's storm surge unit, told LiveScience, citing a number of inconsistent figures from past hurricanes.

For example, Hurricane Katrina, which was a Category 3 storm, had a storm surge of more than 20 feet (6 m) in some locations. Hurricane Charley, on the other hand — which hit Florida in 2004 — was a Category 4 storm, but only caused storm surges of about 8 feet (2.4 m), Brinkley said. [5 Hurricane Categories: Historical Examples]

In the past, the NHC included brackets of estimated storm surges for each category in their Saffir-Simpson Scale. But, as a result of a long string of inconsistencies within the last decade, officials decided to eliminate these estimates in 2010 to prevent public confusion. The bracket for a Category 1 storm had been 3 feet to 5 feet (1 to 1.7 m), which would have suggested only a fraction of Sandy's surge.  

In response to this string of destructive storms — including Katrina (2005), Ike (2008), Irene (2011) and Sandy (2012) — researchers have begun looking more closely at the effects that drive storm surge, with some hoping to help implement an official storm surge scale that could be put into action on a national level.

What controls storm surge?

Hal Needham, a researcher at Louisiana State University, has compiled the most comprehensive storm surge database yet, with information gathered from hundreds of newspaper archives, government documents and academic reports dating from the present back to the late 1800s, and representing more than 200 surge events spanning the Gulf Coast up to the Northeast.

The results highlight four main factors that control storm surge: The shape of a coastline, the depth of coastal water, and the wind speed and storm size prior to landfall, specifically, about 18 hours before a storm hits land.

Angular coastlines funnel water landward, whereas smoother coastlines allow water to spread out more evenly, Needham said. Shallow water piles higher than deeper water, and high offshore winds cause swells to form far out at sea that continue to amplify as they travel landward. [Hurricane Sandy's Impact]

Sandy's massive offshore wind field — with a radius of about 207 miles (333 km) of hurricane-force winds — factored into its massive surge, Needham said. This was also the case with Katrina, which had a radius of about 135 miles (217 km). Charley, on the other hand, only had a radius of about 25 miles (40 km). The shallow and confined nature of the New York Bay and Lake Borgne, which borders New Orleans, also factored into the large storm surges produced in these two regions. The coast of Florida where Charley made landfall, on the other hand, is relatively less confined and drops off into deeper ocean faster than the coastlines of New York and Louisiana.

Needham's team is still teasing out which, if any, of the myriad factors plays the largest role in surge height.

"We are finding that it is much more complex than most people would realize," Needham told LiveScience. "We are still working to understand how these factors all work together."

Storm surge warning system

Jennifer Irish, a coastal engineer at Virginia Tech who also studies the relationship between storm surge and wind speed, agrees that the pre-landfall size and speed of a hurricane play a crucial role in flooding.

"What we found is taking the hurricane statistics 90 nautical miles offshore gives us the best estimate of storm surge," Irish told LiveScience.

This estimate is roughly — but not exactly — in line with Needham's estimate of 18 hours prior to landfall, Irish said.

Irish's work has also highlighted the particular vulnerability of shallow, narrow coastlines, explaining why the small bite, or narrow bay, between southern New York and northern New Jersey is especially conducive to high surges.

Taking these factors into account, Irish's team has produced a new surge scale that they believe is ready for implementation and could significantly improve public preparation for hurricane threats. The NHC has not yet adopted it, but the team hopes that they will within the next couple of years. 

"It takes time to work through the system," Irish said. "But I do think the scale we have is easy to apply and just as easy to use as the current category scale."

Brinkley, with the NHC's storm surge unit, said NHC officials are also making an effort to improve the category system.

"This is something that is going to take time," Brinkley said. "We are always making improvements, but we still have a lot more to accomplish."

Follow Laura Poppick on TwitterFollow LiveScience on TwitterFacebook and Google+. Original article on LiveScience.

Copyright 2013 LiveScience, a TechMediaNetwork company. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to With storms like Sandy, it's the flooding, not the wind, that gets you
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today