How climate influences weather: six questions

From extreme rains in some places to early spring in others, weather events prompt questions about what role climate change may be playing.

Mark Lennihan/AP
Visitors to Central Park pass a flowering rhododendron on Feb. 28 in New York. Some scientists say spring may be record early in about half the nation in 2017.

1. Does climate change cause extreme weather events?

Not really, in a pure sense. But think of climate as the broad forces and patterns in the air and oceans that set the parameters for the weather – the everyday variations in things such as wind and precipitation. When climate changes, it affects the weather, including the intensity and frequency of some extreme weather events.

For years scientists have cautioned people against confusing climate with weather, and climate-change doubters remind us that blizzards and hurricanes occurred long before industrialization increased the amount of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere.

Instead of, “Was X event caused by climate change?” meteorology professor David Titley at the Pennsylvania State University says “A better way to frame it is, ‘what’s the new frequency for this type of event?’ Or, ‘how often or how severe will these sorts of events be in the future?’ ”

​So, for example, some researchers say their models suggest climate change is making extreme rainfall cycles (as well as periods of drought) more likely in California​. Rising average temperatures are also making heat waves more common globally, including in months like February when you wouldn't traditionally expect them in northern latitudes.

The conclusions scientists draw are inevitably estimates, not firm cause-effect equations. But many believe their ability to tease out the role that climate change probably played in certain weather events has increased dramatically, as has their understanding of how global warming translates into regional weather trends.

1 of 6

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.