How taking the 'perma' out of permafrost could accelerate global warming

As permafrost thaws, it changes the composition of vegetation in the Arctic. This could accelerate global warming, say scientists

Government of Northwest Territories/AP Photo
This July 24, 1996 photo released by the Government of Northwest Territories shows the Canadian Arctic community of Tuktoyaktuk in the Northwest Territories, Canada. Seas rising from global warming and land sinking as permafrost thaws are threatening the Canadian Arctic community. A beach barrier of small boulders has slowed the erosion of the peninsula, upper left. Geologists believe the protective Tuktoyaktuk Island, upper right, will erode away in 30-40 years, exposing the hamlet more to Arctic Ocean waves.

The layer just below the Earth's surface is teeming with microbes capable of altering composition of the atmosphere. 

Whether they do so or not all depends on the availability of organic matter in the soil, which in turn depends on whether that soil is frozen or not.

In the Arctic, where, thanks to global warming, permafrost is failing to live up to its name, more organic material is becoming available, and this could spell even more global warming. 

Using a permafrost sample from the region, an international group of researchers studied the changes in the composition of organic matter within the soil that alters the ratio between methane and carbon dioxide produced by anaerobic microbes present within the subsurface, eventually boosting the concentration of greenhouse gases within the atmosphere. The study appeared in a paper titled "Changes in peat chemistry associated with permafrost thaw increase greenhouse gas production," published in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

To start with, frozen soil – which is composed largely of peat – starts thawing. The layer of soil then collapses, and the portion underneath – where a huge chunk of permafrost used to sit earlier – is now inundated with water, says Jeff Chanton, an environmental scientist with the John Widmer Winchester Professor of Oceanography at Florida State, who was involved in the study.

The water contains organic matter, which is degraded by anaerobic bacteria to produce carbon dioxide and methane. Initially the amount of carbon dioxide produced is more than that of methane. But with time, the characteristic of the organic matter changes in a way that boosts the production of methane much more than that of carbon dioxide.

Production of both the substances increase, but the relative ratio between the two changes from 10:1 to 1:1, says Dr. Chanton.

The activities also give way to the production of specific vegetation. "It's like clear cutting a forest," says Chanton. First sphagnum mosses colonize the area. Then sedges start growing in the region. These plants act as conduits for releasing the methane– which is produced at the subsurface – into the atmosphere.

“[T]he associated changes in plant community composition in the polar regions could lead to way more carbon being released into the atmosphere as methane," Chanton said in a press release.

Methane- a more powerful greenhouse gas--is 33 times more effective in heating the Earth than carbon dioxide.

“The world is getting warmer, and the additional release of gas would only add to our problems,” he said in a press release.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.