Why Canada’s Trudeau is Trump's ally on Keystone XL

The pipeline might be symbolically potent in the US, a linchpin in national climate policy. But the Canadian Prime Minister sees a way to support Keystone while still pushing climate goals forward.

Todd Korol/The Canadian Press/AP
Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau greets the press before going into the Liberal cabinet retreat in Calgary, Alberta, on Monday, Jan. 23, 2017.

President Trump may have found a reluctant ally in the battle for Keystone XL in an unlikely place: liberal Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau.

Prime Minister Trudeau reiterated his support for the Keystone XL and Dakota Access pipelines in two separate phone calls with Mr. Trump this week, telling reporters that the controversial project could be approved without ceding his country's newfound status as the driver of North American climate policy.

Mr. Trudeau’s longstanding support of the pipeline might surprise casual followers of Canadian politics, especially in the United States, where he tends to be linked with the style and policies of former President Obama. Just last year, “climate change’s new dynamic duo” hashed out a joint commitment to expand protected zones and cut back on methane emissions from the oil and gas sector.

But the Keystone XL doesn’t have the same symbolic force in Canada as it does in the US, where national climate policy is at a crossroads. And some indigenous groups in Canada control the extraction of petroleum reserves on their territory, the BBC noted in December, making energy issues less galvanizing for First Nation activism.

Trudeau’s climate agenda is still full of aggressive items: In October, for instance, he directed provinces to figure out carbon pricing schemes of at least $10 per tonne, to go into effect in 2018, according to the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation. With local and provincial governments moving ahead on their own legislation and broad support among the Canadian public for climate action, Trudeau’s zigzag may be one image of a path forward.

For some advocates, it’s a path that will further elevate Canada’s renown as the ideological alternative to a Trump-led US. 

“We’re the US’s best friend,” says Jose Etcheverry, a co-chair of the Sustainable Energy Initiative at York University, in an interview with The Christian Science Monitor. “But at the same time, we have a responsibility to be the designated driver in North America. Canada has to become the narrative of the solution.”

For the past eight years, the US had that role, but Trump's pledge to pull out of the Paris Agreement and scale back "out of control" environmental regulations signal his determination to chart a radically different course.

Trudeau’s statements on Tuesday came the same day that Trump signed a series of executive directives reviving the Keystone XL and expediting the environmental-review process for the pipeline and other infrastructure projects deemed high priorities. TransCanada, the pipeline’s builder, says it will reapply for a presidential permit, according to the Associated Press.

In the driver's seat of Canada's oil-related energy dealings is the government of Alberta province, led by progressives who pushed through a carbon tax that went into effect on Jan. 1 – yet who are also conditioning their support for Trudeau’s tough carbon pricing scheme on whether pipelines get approved to whisk the province's oil to market.

Of the three pipelines sought by provincial Premier Rachel Notley, the Keystone is the lowest priority, since the other two would be purely Canadian-run. Her own approval of Trump's actions was measured, noting Trump's avowal to renegotiate the terms of the pipeline in saying she would "continue to monitor this very closely," CBC reported.

For the province, though, the 830,000 daily barrels of crude oil that could be pumped out of Alberta's tar sands by the pipeline represent a key part of its long-term development plans. And Trudeau, who was heckled at a Tuesday town hall forum in Calgary for earlier suggesting that oil sands extraction should be “phased out,” may be trying to assure Alberta residents that he has no intention of clamping down on an industry struggling with low prices.

“The Government of Canada has little choice but to support the revival of the pipeline, with forthcoming assurances that they will respect Indigenous rights and insist on the highest environmental and spill control standards,” writes Ken Coates, the Canada research chair in regional innovation at the University of Saskatchewan’s school of public policy, in an email to the Monitor. “For Western Canada, this is an important economic boost.”

Elsewhere, regional legislation is accelerating change at the federal level, says Dr. Etcheverry. Ontario, British Columbia, and Quebec have instituted carbon taxes in recent years, and the cities of Vancouver and Victoria – and even the rural community of Oxford County, due partly to Etcheverry’s efforts – have adopted official plans to become 100 percent clean-energy powered by 2050.

“That’s extremely important from a paradigm shift perspective,” he says.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.