Why Oslo is banning cars from the city center

The newly-elected leftist city government will make Oslo's central region a car-free zone by 2019. Some 90,000 people commute to work in the city center every day.

Paul Kleiven/Scanpix/Reuters/File
A snow-covered bicycle is parked on a heated pavement in Oslo, March 8, 2012.

Oslo will permanently ban cars in its central region by 2019, the city council announced Monday, marking the first time a capital city has enacted such a comprehensive prohibition of cars.

As part of an effort to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, the ban was instituted by the newly-elected council of 59 representatives of the the Labor Party, the Greens, and the Socialist Left. While local merchants have expressed concerns that the ban will adversely affect business, the politicians say it will benefit everyone in the city in the long run by reducing carbon emissions.

City authorities hope that by 2020, the new plan will cut Oslo’s pollution to 50 percent of 1990 levels, and reduce car traffic in all of Oslo by 20 percent by 2019 and 30 percent by 2030.

"We want to have a car-free center," Lan Marie Nguyen Berg, lead negotiator for the Green Party in Oslo, told Reuters. "We want to make it better for pedestrians, cyclists. It will be better for shops and everyone."

The soon-to-be car-less central area is home to about 1,000 residents and hosts up to 90,000 workers. Business owners point out that 11 of the city’s 57 shopping centers are in the designated car-free zone.  

Oslo’s overall population is 600,000 (about the population of Milwaukee), more than half of whom are car owners.

As it transitions to a car-free downtown, the Norwegian capital will pave about 37 miles of bicycle lanes and heavily invest in public transportation. Oslo already operates "Ruter," a convenient public transit system of buses, trams, subway, and trains, that will continue to serve the car-less zone.

Special arrangements will be provided to transport people with disabilities and deliver products, the three parties said in a statement.

The city council is still researching the details, they said, including conducting experiments and learning best practices from other cities with similar bans.

While Oslo is the first capital city to ban cars permanently, other major cities have executed temporary bans. Last month, Paris banned cars for one day to raise awareness about the city’s air pollution. London and Madrid have also banned cars temporarily, as a remedy for traffic congestion.

The tri-party council will also subsidize the sale of electric bicycles and divest from fossil fuels, they announced. The divestment is at odds with Norway’s overall economic nature, say critics, as the oil industry accounts for a fifth of the country’s economy. Norway’s oil boom in the late 20th century contributed greatly to its current wealth.

But the boom has subsided, experts say, and the country must recalibrate its economic model to prevent decline.

Oslo’s bold undertaking may inspire other major cities to follow suit, whether with outright bans or with taxes on high-emission cars. As the United Nations climate summit in Paris approaches, such endeavors will set the tone for a strong resolution against climate change on a global scale.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Why Oslo is banning cars from the city center
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today