Energy Secretary Moniz promises LNG export decisions this year

In his first congressional testimony as Energy secretary, Ernest Moniz said Thursday he would move 'expeditiously' to decide on applications to export liquefied natural gas. 

Susan Walsh/AP/File
Ernest Moniz speaks after being sworn in as Energy Secretary in May, in Washington. Dr. Moniz, a nuclear physicist at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, replaced Steven Chu, who served as Energy secretary in President Obama's first term.

By the end of the year, newly appointed Energy Secretary Ernest Moniz will tackle one of America's most pressing energy issues: How much liquefied natural gas (LNG) the United States will export to other nations.

"[W]e will expeditiously work through the remaining applications [to build LNG export terminals], reviewing each one on a case-by-case basis to ensure that all approvals are in the public interest," Mr. Moniz said Thursday in prepared remarks for his first congressional testimony as head of the Department of Energy.

When a member of the House Energy and Power Subcommittee asked the secretary whether he would make decisions on export applications this year, he responded: "Yes, absolutely," but declined to be more specific.

It's a sensitive subject, because the US shale boom has created a glut of natural gas. Energy companies are eager to further open up that shale gas production to world markets and push depressed gas prices back up. But those prices have benefitted residential and industrial consumers. More exports could mean an end to cheap electricity from the natural gas oversupply. 

Increasing LNG exports would have a positive net impact on the economy, according to a 2012 report from the Department of Energy (DOE). That assessment drew criticism from some lawmakers who said it drew on older data that did not accurately reflect the nation's current energy landscape. 

In May, two days after Mr. Moniz was confirmed as Energy secretary, the DOE approved the nation's second LNG export terminal – a move that suggested a trend towards a pro-export policy. It was the first approval since 2011.

The momentum slowed a week later when Mr. Moniz called for additional research before approving any more of the roughly 20 applications to export LNG.

In his testimony Thursday, Moniz emphasized President Obama's "all-of-the-above" approach to energy policy, calling for increased natural gas production and the development of low-carbon technologies.

Sworn in May 21, Moniz will oversee a department with a proposed FY 2014 budget of $28.4 billion. That's an 8 percent increase over the $1.75 billion enacted last year. 

Material from the Associated Press was included in this report.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Energy: Energy Secretary Ernest Moniz will ultimately decide how much of the US natural gas glut should reach global markets.

Environment: Natural gas offers a low-carbon alternative to coal but still contributes to greenhouse gas emissions.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.