US eases natural gas glut with second export terminal

The Energy Department authorizes a second US terminal to export liquefied natural gas (LNG), ending months of speculation. LNG exports boost the prospects for domestic natural gas drillers and should help key allies, but they're also likely to boost prices for US consumers and manufacturers and they raise environmental concerns.

Steve Campbell/Houston Chronicle/AP/File
The Excelsior arrives at the Freeport liquid natural gas terminal in Houston. Natural gas exports have been the subject of much debate in Washington and across the country as policymakers and industry analysts weigh the pros and cons.

The US Department of Energy approved Friday the country's first liquified natural gas (LNG) export terminal since 2011.

It's a shift in policy that opens up America's newfound – and vast – natural gas resources to world markets. Advocates say they will improve the US trade balance and provide a boost for the natural gas industry, creating more jobs. The announcement is also a boost to key US allies, especially Japan, which has been lobbying the Obama administration to allow LNG exports as it transitions away from nuclear power.

But US consumers and manufacturers have benefited from the oversupply in the form of lower energy costs. Natural gas prices, which in March 2012 reached a 13-year low, will soar with the increase in foreign demand, critics warn. There are environmental concerns, as well. A global interest in US natural gas means an extended reliance on fossil fuels, delays a shift to clean-tech energy, and increases the use of potentially damaging drilling techniques, environmentalists say.

"It's a bad deal all around: for public health, the environment, and America's working people," Deb Nardone, director of the Sierra Club's Beyond Natural Gas campaign, said in a statement Friday. "LNG export is nothing but a giveaway to the dirty fuel industry, at the expense of everyday Americans." 

The debate over natural gas exports has raged for months in Washington and across the country as policymakers and industry analysts weigh the pros and cons. Friday's announcement suggests that the Obama administration views it in the national interest to export at least some of the country's vast natural gas reserves. The question now is how quickly the administration will proceed in deciding other export applications.

In May 2011, Cheniere Energy Inc.'s Sabine Pass terminal in Louisiana became the first facility authorized to export natural gas, up to 2.2 billion cubic feet per day. Friday's authorization was for Freeport LNG, a $10 billion facility in Texas, for exports of up to 1.4 billion cubic feet per day.

The plant already had authorization to export to countries that have a free-trade agreement with the United States. The new authorization allows exports to nations without a free-trade agreement with the US, such as Japan. Two of Japan's largest utilities, Osaka Gas Co. and Chubu Electric Power Co., have 20-year contracts to buy LNG from Freeport in its first phase.  

Nineteen similar applications await approval. The Department of Energy says in its release that it will process those applications on a case-by-case basis, assessing the market impact on proposed LNG plants "as further information becomes available at the end of 2013."

The natural gas industry would like the administration to move faster.

“While this is a positive step, we would like for the administration to pick up the pace of approvals so that the markets can decide which projects go forward," said Marty Durbin, president and chief executive for America’s Natural Gas Alliance, in a statement.

Hydraulic fracturing and horizontal drilling have unlocked previously unattainable oil and gas from a stubborn rock formation called shale. The US produced 7.8 trillion cubic feet of shale gas in 2011, up from 1 trillion cubic feet in 2006, according to the US Energy Information Administration. That's expected to rise by 114 percent to 16.7 trillion cubic feet in 2040.

The glut explains why energy companies are lining up to seek permission to export a liquid that, several years ago, most companies expected to import. But LNG plants are huge and risky investments, because they rely on low natural gas prices and high LNG prices. If US or world prices swing in a big way, the plants could quickly become unprofitable. 

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Energy: A boom in US energy production, thanks largely to the development of shale gas resources, allows the US to export natural gas.

Environment: Natural gas exports will encourage more hydraulic fracturing in the US and boost greenhouse gas emissions, albeit in lower amounts than other fossil fuels.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

QR Code to US eases natural gas glut with second export terminal
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today