Saudi Arabia, look out. US could lead oil production.

Could the US leapfrog Saudi Arabia as the world's top oil producer? US oil production is set to jump 7 percent this year, inching one step closer to Saudi Arabia's spot as the global leader. 

Gregory Bull/AP/File
In this July 2011 file photo, Austin Mitchell, left, and Ryan Lehto, work on an oil derrick outside of Williston, N.D. U.S. oil output is surging so fast that the United States could soon overtake Saudi Arabia as the world's biggest producer, the Associated Press reports.

A production boom may soon thrust the US ahead of Saudi Arabia as the world's biggest oil producer, the Associated Press reports.

US production of crude and other liquid hydrocarbons is set to jump 7 percent in 2012, making it the fourth straight year of crude increases and the biggest single-year gain since 1951.

What's causing the jump? A combination of factors. The 2010 BP oil spill halted production in the Gulf of Mexico; now, oil companies are returning. New drilling techniques allow oil companies to tap huge shale formations in North Dakota and Texas. High oil prices have given US drillers the necessary cash flow to invest in new techniques and explore sources of oil previously thought unobtainable.  

Should the US overtake Saudi Arabia as the top oil producer, it would be the first time the US has led the world in 10 years. Saudi Arabia has been the world's biggest producer of oil since 2002. Russia has occupied the No. 2 position since 2003, according to the US Energy Information Administration.

While the news bodes well for an energy independent future, Americans can still expect high prices at the gas pump and continued oil imports for years to come. The US Energy Department forecasts an average daily crude and liquid hydrocarbon production of 11.4 million barrels for 2013, well shy of the amount needed to satisfy American demand and Saudi Arabia's output of 11.6 million barrels.

In 2011, the US consumed an estimated 18.9 million barrels per day, according to the EIA.

Persistent turbulence in the Middle East continues to have a negative impact on gas prices, as questions linger over unrest in Syria and sanctions on Iran.

It's still unclear if – or  how – the production boom will affect the presidential election. Energy independence and the future of oil and gas production has served as a point of contention in the 2012 presidential debates.

Private oil and natural gas companies have thrived in recent years, despite what Republican nominee Mitt Romney says is the Obama administration's obstructionist role in the development of fossil fuel sources.

President Obama points to the production boom as a success of his administration's "all-of-the-above" approach. The president promotes an expansion in domestic oil and gas production coupled with federal investment in new, clean energy sources.

But politicians and analysts on both sides of the aisle agree that the oil and gas production boom is a game changer – one that many hope will provide a much-needed boost for a stagnant US economy.

"It's the most important change to the economy since the advent of personal computers pushed up productivity in the 1990s," economist Philip Verleger, a visiting fellow at the Peterson Institute of International Economics, told the Associated Press.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.