Water rights: Environmental groups fight to save Great Salt Lake

Utah’s Great Salt Lake plays a crucial ecological role in the region but is currently facing its lowest level of water since 1847. Environmentalists have achieved some success securing water rights for the lake and are pushing for more to safeguard its future. 

Rick Bowmer/AP
The Great Salt Lake is seen next to Anthelope Island, near Salt Lake City, May 4, 2021. Because the lake is a terminal system, said to have "no beneficial use," its water has historically been diverted for agriculture and development.

In an effort to help save the shrinking Great Salt Lake, environmentalists are attempting a novel idea: securing water rights for a terminal system.

The Great Salt Lake is now nearly a foot below its last recorded level in 1963, alarming environmentalists and Utah’s policymakers.

“Right now, Great Salt Lake is facing its lowest recorded levels ever since 1847. We’re anticipating even lower levels. We hope we don’t see that. With climate change and the serious drought and continued desires to divert more water, this is going to be a challenge,” said Marcelle Shoop, the director of the Audubon Society’s saline lakes program.

Legally speaking, the lake is considered to have “no beneficial use” because it’s a terminal system – water that enters the Great Salt Lake ends there. That has historically contributed to some of the pressure to divert water away from it for agriculture, development, and other needs.

In an effort to help the Great Salt Lake recover, a coalition of environmental groups have partnered with mining company Rio Tinto Kennecott and the Central Utah Water Conservancy District in a first – securing water rights for the lake itself.

“Kennecott has a water right that’s currently in excess of our demands for our mining and industrial operations,” Ted Balling, Rio Tinto Kennecott’s senior advisor for water resources, said in an interview with FOX 13. “We’re able to donate this water right, let it go down the Jordan River out to Farmington Bay to benefit the wildlife and habitat out there.”

The donation, about 21,000-acre feet of water, took years to secure.

“It took two years to work through those issues,” said Ann Neville, the regional director for The Nature Conservancy. “It was really hard, really asking hard questions, using the existing laws and making sure we cross all the T’s, dotted all the I’s.”

Utah’s Division of Wildlife Resources, which will help administer the water rights, said it is believed to be the first time this has happened.

“Water rights are a complicated issue, so we’re grateful for the partnerships that did donate to sort of benefit and restore the Great Salt Lake water levels,” said Faith Heaton Jolley, a spokeswoman for DWR.

Rio Tinto Kennecott also paid for the legal paperwork. Because it is technically a donation, water rights are not permanently transferred and can be taken back if needed. Instead, they will donate the 21,000-acre feet every year for the next 10 years. Mr. Balling said conservation and water efficiency measures at their copper mine allow for it to happen.

“It’s a great step forward and we hope it brings some attention,” said Mr. Balling.

Now that the lake has hit a record low, there are concerns about significant ecological and economic damage. The Great Salt Lake generates snow for our mountains, provides a refuge for millions of birds, and there are concerns about poison-tainted dust storms in northern Utah as a result of the exposed salt beds.

“People don’t realize it’s part of our entire existence when we live around it,” said Ms. Neville.

Given the sheer size of the Great Salt Lake, 21,000-acre feet is not a lot. But Ms. Neville said what this does is open the door for future water rights transactions to help protect the lake.

“There’s a lot of options that we’re looking at that could be an opportunity if they’re not using, could we put it to beneficial use for Great Salt Lake?” she told FOX 13.

The Utah State Legislature has been exploring a number of policy changes including changing the legal definition of Great Salt Lake water and ensuring more water does wind up there.

“There’s a growing change in the way policymakers are seeing this and a recognition that Great Salt Lake is critical,” Ms. Shoop said.

This story was reported by The Associated Press.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.