The love seat: A comic about climate change

Jacob Turcotte/Staff

Once upon a time, in an ad that would seem inconceivable in today’s political environment, Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (a Democrat) and former Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich (a Republican) sat down in a love seat together to urge climate action.

This was back in 2008, and the message was part of a campaign by former Vice President Al Gore to bring Democrats and Republicans together to address the climate crisis. 

But thanks to the rise of political extremism and ramped-up donations from fossil fuel companies to Republican candidates, the climate consensus has broken down. In 2011, Mr. Gingrich repudiated the ad. And since then, President Donald Trump has famously called climate change a “hoax.”

But it looks as though the balance could be shifting again. Polls suggest that, among voters ages 18 to 38, there exists little difference between the responses of Democrats and Republicans when asked if climate change is caused by humans. As the next generation of Republicans takes the helm, climate change denial may go the way of Tyrannosaurus rex.

Eoin O'Carroll and Jacob Turcotte/Staff

Why We Wrote This

Sometimes a political consensus can break down because of fringe actors. But as new generations take the stage, it’s possible to rebuild bipartisan harmony on certain critical issues.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.