How much can one person do to limit climate change? A graphic.

Pedro Rocha/AP
Climate activist Greta Thunberg waves as she arrives in Lisbon on Dec. 3, 2019, after a three-week voyage from the United States. The Swedish teen forgoes air travel and sailed to the Portuguese capital before heading to the U.N. Climate Change Conference in Madrid.

After a year filled with floods, wildfires, and protests, world leaders are gathered in Madrid for the United Nations Climate Change Conference to draft a mitigation plan in accordance with the 2015 Paris Agreement. So far, the acceleration of carbon emissions has slowed, but the trend has yet to be reversed. Emissions are on track to rise by 0.6% percent in 2019, reaching an all-time high

Tijjani Muhammad-Bande, president of the U.N. General Assembly, underscored the weight of the situation on Tuesday. “Science is unequivocal on the urgency to act, both at global and national levels,” he told summit attendees. 

Governments and private companies are responsible for the brunt of global emissions (by one estimate, just 100 corporations are responsible for 71% of global emissions). But many individuals aren’t waiting for governments to set the pace of change. Changing habits like diet and commutes can profoundly affect both our own lives and the larger environment.

Why We Wrote This

Helping to limit global warming can seem like a daunting task for one person. But, as with all massive undertakings, breaking it down into smaller steps can make it seem more manageable.

When Cynthia Kuest sold her car in August, it was a tough decision. But a Monitor cover story about Alaskan homes sinking into the melting permafrost inspired her to try to reduce her carbon footprint, and now she couldn’t be happier. Riding the bus or her bike makes her feel more connected to her community, too. 

Ms. Kuest was one of the readers who responded when we asked our audience how they think about climate change in their daily lives. 

“I can’t force anybody to sell their car or, you know, do anything else about climate change,” she says. “I think the best way for me to communicate how invaluable this is is just to change myself – and who knows, maybe it affects somebody else?”

Karen Norris, Sarah Matusek, Timmy Broderick/Staff
You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.