Hubert Volgelmann/Universit­y of Vermont/AP/File
In this 1981 photo provided by the University of Vermont, red spruce trees damaged by acid rain are visible among other trees near the peak of Camel's Hump in Duxbury, Vt. A recent study found that red spruce trees, once heavily damaged by acid rain, are rebounding in five Northeast states due to stricter air pollution regulations and a changing climate.

Pollution regulations decrease acid rain, spur red spruce rebound

Since the 1960s Clean Air Act, and its reinforcement in the 1990s, air toxins that trigger acid rain have been reduced, resulting in positive ecological effects. Now, Northeast forests once scarred by acid rain are mostly green, with red spruce trees thriving. 

The gray trunks of red spruce trees killed by acid rain once heavily scarred the mountain forests of the Northeast. Now those forests are mostly green, with the crowns of red spruce peeking out of the canopy and saplings thriving below.

A main reason, scientists say, is a government-enforced reduction in the kind of air pollution that triggers acid rain.

"We've seen it go full arc from declining for some unknown reason, to figuring out the reason, to them doing something about the cause, and then the tree responding and rebounding again," said Paul Schaberg, a plant physiologist with the United States Forest Service and a co-author of a new study on red spruce who has been researching the species since the 1980s. "It's just an amazing science arc."

In the 1960s through the 1980s, pollution – mostly from coal-powered plants in the Midwest and car emissions carried by the wind and deposited as acidic rain, snow, and fog – devastated Northeast forests and lakes, leaching nutrients from soil, and killing aquatic life.

Red spruce are particularly sensitive to acid rain and, at the height of the die-off, some forests lost 50 percent of them.

But decades later, not all the environmental damage is turning around at the pace of the red spruce.

Waterways are now showing signs of recovery, as are the upper layers of soil, although they are still strained by the acid deposits. Researchers are finding fish in lakes deemed fishless for years, but the populations are not large and the variety of species is not as diverse as before, said Gregory Lawrence, a research scientist with the US Geological Survey who is based in Troy, New York.

In the 1980s, University of Vermont scientist Hubert Vogelmann brought national attention to the acid rain issue by linking air pollution to forest damage on the slopes of Vermont's Green Mountains. Airborne chemicals reacted with water and oxygen and then, carried by the wind, were deposited as acidic rain, snow, and fog.

The images of dead trees littering mountains in the 1980s helped inspire changes to the Clean Air Act in 1990. The amendments proposed by former President George H.W. Bush in 1989 mandated reductions in certain gas emissions and boosted regulation of toxic pollutants.

The first signs of healthier red spruce trees in the northeastern United States came about five years ago, scientists said, and they decided to take a closer look.

The researchers examined 658 red spruce trees in 52 plots in Vermont, New Hampshire, New York, Massachusetts, and Maine. They found that 75 percent of the trees and 90 percent of the plots showed increasing growth since 2001. They credit cleaner air and a warming climate that extended the growing season.

"Higher temperatures help some species and hurt others – right now, red spruce are benefiting, but they could be vulnerable to change in the future," Dr. Schaberg said.

Similar trends are emerging in the Appalachian Mountains in West Virginia, which were also hit by acid rain, according to a recent report in the Global Change Biology journal.

The two studies provide further evidence that addressing causes of acid rain helped the species recover, said Timothy Fahey, a forest ecologist and professor at Cornell University.

That recovery should help efforts to restore red spruce forests to mountains in central Appalachia, where they were heavily logged in the late 1800s and early 1900s, reducing the habitat for the now-endangered Carolina northern flying squirrel.

Last month in Vermont, Schaberg was hiking through the woods on Mount Mansfield, Vermont's highest peak, with Alexandra Kosiba, lead researcher for their study in the journal Science of the Total Environment. They found red spruce at middle elevations and higher that were thriving. The trees were surrounded by saplings. Seed-bearing cones lay on the ground.

"This is a good sign that the species is doing well in the near term, and then the future forests will have red spruce," said Dr. Kosiba, a staff scientist for the Forest Ecosystem Monitoring Cooperative at the University of Vermont.

This story was reported by The Associated Press. 

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

QR Code to Pollution regulations decrease acid rain, spur red spruce rebound
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today