Conservationists say indigenous perspectives could aid global climate policies

A Swedish funded initiative hopes to include indigenous voices in the worldwide environmental discussion. The goal is to use the intimate environmental knowledge held by indigenous groups to create more effective climate policy worldwide. 

Domenico Pugliese/Survival International/AP/File
Awa Indians explore the Amazon rainforest in Brazil. They live off the land, though their territory is threatened by government renewable energy projects.

With generations of experience conserving land and forests, indigenous people's knowledge about climate change could help inform decisions at next month's United Nations climate talks, but their environmental wisdom is often ignored.

The head of Sweden's international development agency said that must change and climate change negotiators should learn from indigenous people.

"Indigenous people often live and work from forests, land, and water in different ways and they use them in a sustainable way because they need to survive," Carin Jämtin told the Thomson Reuters Foundation.

"That's why we must use the knowledge of those who know how to sustainably use nature," she said during a conference on indigenous land rights in Stockholm this week.

At least a quarter of the world's carbon stored above the ground in tropical forests is found in territories managed by indigenous people and local communities, research has shown.

But even though deforestation rates are lower in areas where indigenous people manage forests, much of their knowledge is not taken into account when international decisions about climate change are made, experts say.

"My message to climate change negotiators would be 'learn from them to avoid causing climate change'," said Ms. Jämtin, director-general of the Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency.

Sweden is a major backer of the Global Tenure Facility, launched this week as the first international funding pact to provide grants to advance indigenous people's rights and help them protect their land and natural resources.

Funders, which also include the Ford Foundation and the governments of Norway, have committed $25 million over the next four years, and the facility expects to receive a further $50 million from donors.

"This is a groundbreaking initiative because it puts indigenous people and local communities in the driver's seat," said Jämtin.

"Land rights matter in different ways, in the fight against climate change, but also ... in eradicating poverty and in reaching the [United Nations'] Sustainable Development Goals," she said.

Despite evidence that indigenous people are the best stewards of tropical forests, only a handful of countries recognized this in national action plans submitted for the 2015 Paris climate change accord to curb planet warming emissions.

Just more than 20 out of almost 200 countries made clear commitments to support community-based tenure or natural resource management in their plans, according to the Rights and Resources Initiative, a global network that works to advance indigenous land rights.

"We have to recognize that climate change is real, caused by humans, and has disproportionate effects on indigenous people and rural communities in developing countries," said Jämtin. 

This story was reported by the Thomson Reuters Foundation. 

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.