Outdoor companies boycott Utah shows to stand up for Bears Ears monument

As Utah Republicans fight against the Bears Ears monument designation, several outdoor wear retailers have announced a boycott of retailer shows in the state. 

Francisco Kjolseth/The Salt Lake Tribune/AP/File
The Bears Ears landscape became a national monument under former President Barack Obama. Utah's House of Representatives passed a resolution asking President Donald Trump to repeal the newly named Bears Ears National Monument.

Several outdoor gear companies have announced they will skip Outdoor Retailer shows in Salt Lake City to protest Utah Gov. Gary Herbert’s moves to eliminate or drastically decrease the size of the Bears Ears monument.

Days before leaving office, former President Barack Obama designated the vast Bears Ears landscape in Utah a national monument, granting it permanent protection. But some, including Utah’s legislators and other elected officials, say Mr. Obama overstepped his authority in doing so, exercising executive power without considering how the designation would affect Utah’s business interests and economy.

Mr. Herbert, a Republican, responded to the designation earlier this month by signing a non-binding resolution that asks President Trump to repeal the designation.

"These lands deserve our protection, but a unilateral monument designation is not the way to do it,” Herbert wrote in a Facebook post.

Patagonia met that resolution with the announcement of a boycott in attempt to pressure Utah officials.

“[Herbert is] making it clear that he and other Utah elected officials do not support public lands conservation nor do they value the economic benefits—$12 billion in consumer spending and 122,000 jobs—that the outdoor recreation industry brings to their state,” Patagonia President and chief executive Rose Marcario said in a statement.

Peak Design, Arc'teryx, Kokopelli Packraft, Power Practical, Polartec Fabrics, Metolius Climbing, and Bedrock Sandals have all decided to follow Patagonia’s lead.

"I think the accusation that we are, in fact, trying to take away access to public lands … does not stand up under scrutiny," Herbert said this week.

Some large retailers, such as North Face, have noted that boycotting the shows will serve to hurt smaller businesses the most. But for some of those companies, standing up for the monument is worth the economic risk.

"It's a bummer, to be honest," Utah-based Power Practical’s chief executive Matt Ford told The Salt Lake Tribune. "Having a show here is really convenient for a small company. It'd be a lose-lose for us if it goes someplace else."

But, he added, "this company started in the Utah backcountry. That's what started our first products, and the team is passionate about this issue."

Still, it may be difficult for Herbert and other Utah Republicans to find the necessary support for their efforts.

The Antiquities Act, which allowed Obama to designate the monument, requires a vote by Congress. University of Colorado law professor Mark Squillace, an expert on the Antiquities Act, previously told NPR that getting votes from Congress to rescind the monument won’t be easy.

"It turns out that the designation of national monuments is very popular with the public," he says.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.