Invasive Asian carp are present in three Great Lakes. How can conservationists fight back?

Several species of the invasive fish are proving a challenge for conservationists, who are trying to protect local ecosystems with strategies from nets to dams.

Rachel Von/ The Journal Gazette via AP/ File
Little River Wetlands' Betsy Yankowiak poses for a photo with the rebuilt drainage ditch berm at Eagle Marsh Nature Preserve in Fort Wayne, Ind. on Tuesday, May 10, 2016. Yankowiak along with State and local officials spoke Wednesday at Fox Island County Park in Fort Wayne to discuss the Eagle Marsh berm, which has been rebuilt and enlarged to stop the possible spread of Asian carp.

Grass carp have invaded three of the five Great Lakes, poising them to become an increasing environmental risk – but there's still time to act, according to a new report.

Several Asian carp species are poised to become dominant players in the freshwater lakes’ ecosystem, and could threaten native fishes by competing for both food and habitats,  found a scientific analysis of the population published on Friday. Researchers believe it is “very likely” that grass carp will become established populations in four of the lakes within the next decade unless officials take effective legal and infrastructure advances to stop their spread.

"For the first time, we have a binational, peer-reviewed study by some of the best minds and practitioners in the field who have a consensus on what the risk is to the Great Lakes from grass carp, and it's pretty substantial," Marc Gaden, a spokesman for the Great Lakes Fishery Commission, told the Associated Press.

Biologists say that grass carp are among the least concerning carp species, with the bighead and silver carp species posing greater threats as they compete with native fish for food. In contrast, grass carp survive on vegetation that provides habitats and breeding grounds for local fish.

Grass carp have been spotted in Lakes Erie, Michigan, and Ontario, but researchers in the US and Canada have yet to gauge a solid estimate of how many fish there are or how vast their territory has become. The species was initially introduced to US waters in the 1960s, as officials sought to curtail weed growth in waterways. Since then, some have migrated north, reaching the Great Lakes via the Mississippi River.

Evidence of Asian carp in the Great Lakes is nothing new, but their growing presence has raised concerns. A study published last year found that carp could make up one-third of the fish population in Lake Erie, should they continue to migrate to the lake and reproduce. Fearing the impact the ecological shift could have on native species and the lake’s valuable diversity, officials have considered costly plans to build barriers.

Fish purposely released from hatcheries are usually sterilized, but some found in the Great Lakes region have been fertile, leading researchers to worry they could establish a stable population comprised of several generations.

"Our assessment is saying that yes, they were showing up before, but now they're starting the invasion process," Becky Cudmore, the Asian carp program manager for Canada's fisheries and oceans agency and author of the report, told the Associated Press. "They have arrived. Now is the time to act."

While there’s still time for researchers to act, there isn’t a single clear – or cheap – path forward. Experts behind Friday’s study say a renewed enforcement of laws that prohibit bringing carp to the region could help, along with ensuring that fertile fish aren’t let out of hatcheries. Conservationists could also use nets to block them from entering the lakes, particularly during times of the year when they reproduce.

In 2014, a US Army Corps of Engineers study found that it would likely take 25 years and billions of dollars to stop Asian carp and other nonnative species from invading the lakes. While several of their most foolproof recommendations centered around building a permanent barrier, some note that the costly construction would interfere with barging interests.

“There is a residual risk for all of these [options],” Dave Wethington, a Chicago-area waterway system project manager for the US Army Corps of Engineers, said in 2014. “The ultimate decision is up to the collaborative group of stakeholders.”

This report contains material from the Associated Press.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.