Earth Overshoot Day falls on earliest date yet

Earth Overshoot Day – marking the point in the year when we've used up more natural resources than we can regenerate – falls on Aug. 8 this year, the earliest date yet. 

Earth Overshoot Day, also known as Ecological Debt Day, marks the date each year when we’ve used up as many natural resources as Earth can regenerate in a single year. 

This year, it falls on Monday, August 8: the earliest date yet.

The timing of Earth Overshoot Day is calculated by international think tank Global Footprint Network.

"Earth Overshoot Day is computed by dividing the planet’s biocapacity (the amount of ecological resources Earth is able to generate that year) by humanity’s Ecological Footprint (humanity’s demand for that year)," according to the Global Footprint Network website. "This ratio is multiplied by 365 to get the date when Earth Overshoot Day is reached."

Since its inception, the day has been creeping forward slowly but steadily; in 2000, Earth Overshoot Day fell in late September. Last year, it fell on August 13. 

The Global Footprint Network attributes the early date to high rates of carbon dioxide emittance, depletion of fisheries, and forest harvestation. It calculates that the carbon footprint makes up 60 percent of humanity’s total ecological footprint.

But there is some indication of improvement: The rate at which the day moves up on the calendar has slowed. When the project was established in the early 1970s, the day moved up at an average of three days per year. Now, aside from the jump between 2015 and 2016, the average rate has slowed to less than one day per year over the past five years, Time reports. 

The day’s creators are hopeful that the trend could someday reverse altogether. In a news release, the organization calls for adherence to the goals set by the Paris climate agreement, saying that the carbon footprint could fall to zero by 2050. 

"Such a new way of living comes with many advantages, and making it happen takes effort," said Mathis Wackernagel, co-founder and chief executive officer of Global Footprint Network, in the release. "The good news is that it is possible with current technology, and financially advantageous with overall benefits exceeding costs ... The only resource we still need more of is political will." 

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.