Water in California: back to business as usual?

The Golden State is contemplating whether to end or extend water conservation efforts after a wet winter helped ease drought conditions.

|
Rich Pedroncelli/AP/File
A lawn is irrigated in Sacramento, Calif., June 2015. California will consider lifting a mandatory statewide water conservation order for cities and towns after a rainy, snowy winter eased the state's five-year drought, water officials said Monday.

A wet winter restored rain and snowfall levels in some areas of California to pre-drought levels, prompting questions about unpopular water conservation efforts.

During the past five years of drought, the state has undertaken a massive shift in the way residents and industries use water. Now that the emergency-level drought appears to have subsided, state officials are faced with a pivotal question: Should the measures taken to reduce water consumption remain in place as a hedge against future drought, or can Californians return to business as usual?

Democratic Gov. Jerry Brown is considering issuing an executive order to make the water restrictions permanent.

"We know that drought is becoming a regular occurrence, and water conservation must be a part of our everyday life," Governor Brown said in a statement.

The decision is in the hands of the Water Resource Control Board, which will vote on May 18 whether the original conservation order should come to an end.

The original conservation order, issued in April 2015 at the height of California's driest four-year period in history, required every water district in the state to reduce consumption by at least 20 percent.

In most areas, the conservation efforts met the goal and more, saving water use statewide by nearly 25 percent. The amount saved could supply 17 percent of the state’s population with water for a year.

The success of conservation efforts hinged, in no small part, on the buy-in of concerned residents around the state. Many were proactive about adopting water-conservative landscaping and adopting conservation-friendly programs like the StormCatcher Project, which captures rainwater to stop pollution from reaching the ocean and save water.

Many of the state water districts have also implemented incentives for replacing water-dependent lawns and yards and adopted shaming techniques to blast high-profile Californians who refused to conserve.

If the order continues, it would require each water district in the state to continue reporting water usage monthly. Residents would be barred from letting water from sprinklers run off into the street or washing cars at home without the use of a nozzle to help conserve.

Additional strategies would be required by the plan to force urban, farm, and water districts to allocate resources and layout emergency plans if the drought continues into 2017.

So far, Brown has appeared unrelenting in his conservation efforts, despite calls from water agencies to relax the order after a positive winter.

Brown and many of the state water officials are working on "making permanent the idea that conservation programs are not a drought-only policy,"said  Peter Gleick, president of the Pacific Institute think-tank on water policy, reported the Associated Press.

"Even without a drought emergency, we have to do a better job of monitoring and measuring and managing water. There's just not enough of it anymore for everybody," Mr. Gleick added.

This report contains material from the Associated Press.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Water in California: back to business as usual?
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Environment/2016/0510/Water-in-California-back-to-business-as-usual
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe