Courtesy of Brian Harvey
Trees grow densely in Glacier National Park, thirteen years after the Wedge Canyon Fire, which was followed by three years of cooler, wetter conditions. This photo was taken from near the edge of a stand-replacing burn patch – close to surviving seed sources.
Courtesy of Brian Harvey
Trees near Yellowstone National Park grow sparsely sixteen years after the Beaver Creek Fire, which was followed by three years of severe drought. This photo was taken far from the edge of a stand-replacing burn patch – away from surviving seed sources.

Why US droughts spell trouble for forests after a fire

Drought reduces seeds' ability to germinate after a forest fire, a significant problem as climate change leads to more severe fires across the American West. 

Worsening droughts in the United States create a double threat for forest fires, according to climate researchers at the University of Wisconsin-Madison and the Washington State Department of Natural Resources.

With 14 percent of the contiguous US currently experiencing drought and climate change increasing the risk of severe forest fires, understanding the role drought plays in wildfire risk and forest recovery is becoming increasingly important. 

Rocky Mountain forest fire sites are "the front lines of climate change," lead author Brian Harvey, now a postdoctoral Smith Fellow at the University of Colorado-Boulder, said in a UCB press release. He and coauthor Daniel Donato, now a natural resource scientist for the state of Washington, hope their research will help inform future forest management.

"This study is a crystal ball of sorts that helps us to see what forest recovery may look like in the future following severe fires," Harvey said. "These forests are well adapted to severe fires, but the net result of larger fires and warmer temperatures will likely be a decrease in tree density, a reduction in forest extent, and more forest patchiness in high-elevation areas."

The study could help land managers understand the importance of unburned "islands" near a forest fire site, learning to leave alone patches that could help restore burn areas. Other UWM researchers are also studying how much moisture various species need in order to germinate. 

The study, published last week in Global Ecology and Biogeography, found hot conditions make it difficult for new seeds to take hold after a fire. Some species are particularly well-adapted: the seed cones of lodgepole pines, for example, release thousands of seeds when burned. Drier conditions make it hard for them to grow, however; that becomes even more difficult as the space widens between burned patches and plots that contain new seeds.

"From all the best available data and modeling, and expectations about future climate, these are the kinds of fires and post-fire climates that we’re going to see more of in the future," Dr. Harvey said in a UWM press release. The results could help researchers create more precise fire forest models, as well.

The research team visited 184 sites in the US Rockies that had experienced forest fires between 1994 and 2003, collecting data on the number, species, age, position, and size of trees, shrubs, and grasses to compare with the pre-fire conditions. They then studied climate records to learn about whether drought had impacted the area afterward, and how severely.

More seeds successfully grew under cooler, wetter conditions, and when burned patches were closer to non-burned areas, they found, particularly subalpine species like the Engelmann spruce and subalpine fir. 

"We want to tease this apart so we can anticipate what the ecosystem services (like carbon storage and wildlife habitat) will be in the future, what the landscape will look like, what it means for people’s ability to recreate and where their communities are," she said. "There are a lot of human dimensions that come from the character and distribution of these forests."

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

QR Code to Why US droughts spell trouble for forests after a fire
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today