Can conservative Schwarzenegger flip the script on US climate debate?

The former governor of California urges Americans to stop bickering about whether fossil fuels have contributed to climate change. Instead, he says, the US should transition to clean energy because it makes economic sense.

Michel Euler/AP
Former US California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger (l.) meets French Foreign Minister Laurent Fabius at the COP21, United Nations Climate Change Conference in Le Bourget, north of Paris, Tuesday. The United Nations secretary-general called for a clean energy revolution to avoid a 'climate catastrophe' as talks on a global warming pact entered their final week.

While in Paris this week to attend the global climate summit, former California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger sent a bold message about climate change: it doesn't matter which side of the climate debate you're on, it is time to act on the issue.

"I couldn’t care less if you're concerned about temperatures rising or melting glaciers,” the former Governator wrote in an open letter on Facebook. “It doesn't matter to me which of us is right about the science. I just hope that you'll join me in opening [the door], to a smarter, cleaner, healthier, more profitable energy future.”

During a talk at SciencesPo, a Paris-based research university, he acknowledged that such comments may seem unusual coming from a “conservative, Hummer-driving” former politician.

"It has nothing to do with my political affiliation or with my ideology," the Austrian bodybuilder-turned-actor-turned politician said. "It has simply to do with where I was born ... the environment was absolutely everything to us."

Independent assessments agree with Mr. Schwarzenegger’s argument that because fossil fuels will eventually run out, it is wise to start investing in and transitioning to renewable energy sources.

“Society will eventually adopt renewable energy, since fossil fuels are limited in supply and only created over geologic time. Thus the question is not whether society will shift to renewable energy, but when,” David Timmons, assistant professor of environmental economics at the University of Massachusetts, Boston, wrote in a 2014 report.

As governor of California, Schwarzenegger oversaw California’s transition to sourcing 33 percent of its energy from renewables like solar power by the year 2020, and the passage of bills aimed at reducing California’s greenhouse-gas emissions.

While in Paris, Schwarzenegger also endorsed eating less meat as an additional step towards helping the planet breathe a little easier. Meat-producers like cows are a major source of greenhouse-gas emissions.

"People will buy in to stop eating meat one or two days a week – you have to start slowly. It's a very big challenge but it doesn't mean it shouldn't be done,” he told the BBC.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.