Could US pollution regulations help smog-enshrouded China?

The EPA administrator suggests China mimic new US policies to reduce air pollution.

Kim Kyung-Hoon/Reuters
The Forbidden City is seen from the top of Jingshan Park during a heavily polluted day in Beijing, China, November 29. Beijing plans to ramp up its already tough car emission standards by 2017 in a bid by one of the world's most polluted cities to improve its often hazardous air quality.

The Paris climate talks may be proving an opportunity for officials to swap environmental tips.

Gina McCarthy, administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), has been suggesting to Chinese officials that US air pollution regulations, specifically President Obama's Clean Power Plan, could prove a useful model.

Meanwhile back in the United States, the new rules are under attack from Republican critics. 

Ms. McCarthy is in Paris to promote the policy as something other countries can draw from in creating their own climate plans. 

China, as the world’s biggest carbon emitter, is an obvious target for McCarthy’s efforts.

"Our Clean Power Plan will not only reduce carbon pollution but significantly reduce the pollutants that cause smog and soot, which is one of their major concerns," McCarthy told Reuters in an interview at the Paris climate summit.

Major cities across China have been struggling with smog-filled air. On Monday, government officials issued their first ever "red alert" for air quality in China’s capital, Beijing. The alert will remain place until noon on Thursday.

Schools are closed, automobile traffic is limited and other measures are in place to keep people indoors, away from the toxic smog.

At 4 p.m. Tuesday afternoon, the municipal air quality index read 308, a level considered hazardous in the United States. The New York Times' Edward Wong compared a stroll through the city at the time to walking through a coal mine.

The city’s energy largely comes from coal-burning power plants, a top source of carbon dioxide emissions. Curbing the use of coal could help reduce the city’s toxic smog and greenhouse gas emissions.

The US’s Clean Power Plan was announced in August to limited carbon pollution from power plants. Under the plan, the EPA determines emissions goals for individual states but the states can determine how to meet those goals. 

States are required to submit plans by 2018 and start cutting emissions by 2022 or face a plan imposed by the EPA. 

If all goes according to plan, the US will cut carbon emissions by 32 percent from 2005 levels by 2030.

In addition to promoting the Clean Power Plan and the 1970s federal Clean Air Act as a model, McCarthy is also working with China to develop a national cap-and-trade system

Chinese officials announced in September that the nation would work to set up a cap-and-trade system to limit global warming-causing greenhouse gas emissions. 

"What folks may not realize is that the EPA has had a strong relationship with China for a very long time," McCarthy said. The EPA has also worked with officials in Beijing to install air monitoring systems.

This report contains material from Reuters.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

QR Code to Could US pollution regulations help smog-enshrouded China?
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today