Threatened African vultures may be ugly, but we need them

Although few people would list the vulture among their favorite animals, conservationists say the species is vital to the African ecosystem and we should do everything possible to prevent their extinction. 

Denis Farrell/AP/File
A Cape vulture (r.) and a pied crow (l.) await to feed on a carcass of a pig at a 'vulture restaurant' at Mogale's Gate Reserve near Krugersdorp, South Africa, June 22, 2011. Conservation group BirdLife International said Thursday that the Cape vulture was vulnerable and is now considered as endangered, with four other vulture species now being listed as critically endangered, and put on an international 'red list' of species under threat.

When considering threatened African wildlife, charismatic species such as the rhino, lion, or elephant get a lot of global attention. But BirdLife International, an organization that connects bird conservationists worldwide, says African vultures deserve some of the spotlight too.

BirdLife suggests poachers are deliberately targeting African vultures because the birds circle dead animals and often alert authorities to wild animals that were killed illegally. Their decline is also likely caused by habitat loss, feeding on poisoned livestock, and being hunted by locals for their use in traditional medicine.

Although most people lack much compassion for the vulture, conservationists say it will be bad news for everyone if the vultures disappear. Not only will the African landscape be riddled with decaying carcasses, but the populations of other, peskier scavengers such as rats and jackals could increase. 

“Vultures are important. They come in, they clean up and they leave,” Ross Wanless of BirdLife South Africa told the Guardian. “Other scavengers like rats and jackals will eat a carcass and then will go after livestock or become a pest to humans. And if vultures are removed, their numbers can increase.”

By removing carcasses from the landscape that other species normally would avoid, African vultures act as “a biological recycling team” preventing the spread of diseases between animals and humans. Unfortunately, vultures “are saddled with cultural perceptions relating to death, decay, and maliciousness,” says BirdLife International.

Just in the last 30 years, the number of vultures in West Africa has declined by 95 percent outside of protected areas and only about 100 breeding pairs of bearded vultures are left in South Africa, reports BirdLife.

But conservationists say the African vulture is not doomed. As The Christian Science Monitor reported in 2004, the Asian vulture once faced a 92 to 99 percent population decline because of a prevalent veterinary drug. Countries such as Bangladesh, India and Nepal gathered to discuss the plight of the Asian vulture in 2012, and the population has witnessed a gradual rebound.

“Your support for these unsung heroes is vital,” said Roger Safford, BirdLife’s Preventing Extinctions Program Coordinator. 

This report contains material from the Associated Press.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.