Economic bite of climate change could be even bigger than we thought

Analysis of how various economies have fared during previous climatic fluctuations paints a much starker picture of the global economy in a warming world.

Michel Euler/AP/File
A general view of a dome representing the Earth, at France's environment ministry, which is hosting a global climate exhibition, in Paris, France, Sept. 30.

Climate change could cause ten times as much damage to the global economy than previously predicted, analysis of previous climatic fluctuations suggests.

Typical climate studies have looked at economic projections for a warming planet, with the post-climate change reality compared to a control temperature. Researchers at Stanford University and the University of California, Berkeley departed from this norm and first established what optimal economic outputs were during historically more temperate years. They surveyed 166 countries using data from 1960 to 2010, then compared that peak performance with years when the weather was more extreme. 

The results paint a much more dramatic picture of a warmer planet than previously envisioned. 

"If you have a lot of data on a lot of countries in a lot of years, that allows you to start to distinguish the particular role of temperature in economic performance," said Stanford's Marshall Burke, the co-lead author in an interview with Bloomberg

Countries facing already hotter than the optimal temperature – of about 55 degrees Fahrenheit – are likely to fare worse economically from climate change, according to the paper. Temperature is blind to traditional measurements of economy standing; rich or poor, agricultural or industrial, rising temperatures are take an economic toll. Climate change, the researchers say, will dramatically impact economies worldwide. 

Thomas Sterner, an environmental economist at the University of Gothenburg in Sweden who was not part of the study, writes in a companion commentary article that if the study withstands scrutiny, it will have "wide-reaching implications."

Mr. Sterner cites two examples: if warming continues on its projected 4.3 degrees Celsius average increase worldwide by 2100, economies can anticipate a quarter loss in income compared to a world that experiences no warming. 

Sterner also warns that "global income will become more unequal" as different regions "benefit (particularly those that have a cold climate today, which tend to be countries with quite high incomes) whereas others, especially the (warmest and) poorest, would be hit very hard."

"Climate is not fate," Mr. Burke told Bloomberg. "Countries can do a lot, and there many other factors beyond temperature that matter," such as geography, culture, and government.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.