Fossil fuel executives pledge emissions cuts: turning point or publicity stunt?

In an unprecedented move, executives from ten fossil fuel companies on Friday announced a joint pledge to lower emissions. The details, however, remain murky.

Jacques Brinon/AP
CEOs of oil and gas companies stands before a meeting, Friday, in Paris, France. The chief executives of several of the world's biggest oil and gas companies have pledged support for an 'effective' deal to fight global warming at a Paris conference next month.

In an attempt to boost the industry image, oil and gas executives pledged to lower emissions on Friday, but were unable to agree on a price for carbon emissions.

In an unprecedented move, executives of 10 fossil fuel companies held a joint press conference in Paris. The companies called for an “effective” agreement on carbon emissions at the United Nations summit in December, where nearly 200 nations will try to create a climate change agreement.

The companies also promised to collaborate on limiting emissions. One promise will likely include commitments to minimize gas flaring from refineries, which the World Bank estimates produces 300 million tons of carbon dioxide per year. The companies, however, did not have an agreed message about a mechanism for carbon pricing, which seven European companies this year agreed to follow.

“We have international oil companies and national oil companies and some of the nations have a different view on carbon pricing as a group,” BP chief executive officer Bob Dudley told Reuters. 

The failure to agree on carbon pricing may show a deep divide among industry leaders. Officials who attended the discussions before the press conference said the heads of national oil companies of Saudi Aramco, Mexico, and India’s Reliance Industries insisted on not including any statement on carbon pricing.

The US counterparts for many of these companies, including Exxon Mobil and Chevron, stayed away from the initiative all together.

Several of the companies involved have previously come out in support of carbon pricing.

Many of the companies represented at the conference are fighting for the future of the industry, as public opinion turns away from fossil fuels and major oil countries like China and India turn toward renewable resources.

The group is trying to recruit more companies and refocus on a clearer stance on reducing carbon emissions. Total chief executive Patrick Pouyanné said a major Chinese oil and gas company would be joining the talks by the end of the year.

Critics are taking aim at the lack of a clear plan and the absence of a mechanism for carbon emission pricing.

“Their latest intervention contained nothing meaningful that will significantly aid the decarbonization of the global economy,” Charlie Kronick of Greenpeace told Reuters.

This report includes material from Reuters.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Fossil fuel executives pledge emissions cuts: turning point or publicity stunt?
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Environment/2015/1016/Fossil-fuel-executives-pledge-emissions-cuts-turning-point-or-publicity-stunt
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe