Why New Jersey judge shut advocates out of Exxon settlement negotiations

Superior Court Judge Michael Hogan on Friday dismissed a lawsuit challenging the settlement between the oil giant and the state of New Jersey.

Gene J. Puskar/AP
Gas prices are on display at a Pittsburgh Exxon mini-mart, Feb. 27, 2012. A New Jersey judge on Friday dismissed a lawsuit challenging the $225 settlement between the Exxon Mobil and the state of New Jersey.

A New Jersey judge ruled Friday that environmental groups and a Democratic state senator cannot intervene in the state’s $225 million settlement with Exxon Mobil.

On Friday, Superior Court Judge Michael Hogan denied the request from state Sen. Raymond Lesniak and four environmental groups to intervene in a potential settlement between Exxon Mobil and New Jersey over contaminated gas stations. Judge Hogan said the groups did not have standing to bring the lawsuit to begin with.

New Jersey was originally seeking $8.9 billion for natural resources damaged by pollution from 1,700 retail gasoline stations, two oil refineries, and a number of other sites owned by the Texas-based oil and gas provider. Shortly before Judge Hogan ruled on the case, Exxon and New Jersey announced they had reached a settlement for $225 million.

The money, regardless of the amount, will be used to clean up the various sites and rectify damages done to natural resources. The Christie administration said the settlement was a better option, as pursing the $8.9 billion originally requested by the state would result in long and expensive litigation.

Clean Water Action, Delaware Riverkeeper, Environment New Jersey, and New Jersey Sierra Club are planning further appeals. This is the second time Judge Hogan has denied their petitions for the case.

The groups have not set an amount they would seek from Exxon Mobil, but it would be more than the $225 million. The New Jersey Sierra Club calls the settlement “the biggest sellout of taxpayer money in state history” on their website.

The state Department of Environmental Protection and Mr. Hogan have said that Exxon Mobil will be required to clean the sites, but the environmental groups do not believe the required clean up will be enough.

“This deal only requires Exxon to cap and fill the sites, which is not really a cleanup. Instead of cleaning it up, they would leave tons of oil and chemicals in the ground,” The New Jersey Sierra Club wrote in a statement on their website. “These sites are extremely contaminated and impact streams and wetlands.”

The state of New Jersey opposed the intervention. 

Exxon Mobil spokesman Todd Spitler told the Associated Press the settlement is fair and reasonable and Judge Hogan’s decision provides certainty.

This report includes material from the Associated Press.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Why New Jersey judge shut advocates out of Exxon settlement negotiations
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Environment/2015/1009/Why-New-Jersey-judge-shut-advocates-out-of-Exxon-settlement-negotiations
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe