How bad is the ocean's plastic problem? What sea birds tell us.

A new study has found that majority of seabird species have plastic in their gut.

Courtesy of Britta Denise Hardesty/CSIRO
A red-footed booby on Christmas Island, in the Indian Ocean.

Nearly 90 percent of all seabirds alive today have plastic in their stomachs – including remnants of bags, bottle caps, and plastic fibers from synthetic clothes, which have washed out into the ocean from urban rivers, sewers and waste deposits – scientists estimate.

The researchers from Australia's the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation and Imperial College London looked at published studies since the early 1960s, and found that the number of seabirds – including albatrosses, shearwaters, and penguins – that have ingested plastic has increased significantly since 1980.

In 1960, less than five percent of seabirds had plastic in their stomachs; they put that number at 90 percent today.

"We predict, using historical observations, that 90 percent of individual seabirds have eaten plastic. This is a huge amount and really points to the ubiquity of plastic pollution,” said Dr. Chris Wilcox, study leader and senior research scientist at CSIRO Oceans and Atmosphere in a news release.

Birds ingest the material at such high rates because they often confuse the brightly colored items floating on surface waters with food and “this causes gut impaction, weight loss, and sometimes even death,”  the researchers said.

According to the study, that figure is set to increase. Last December, research found that, more than 5 trillion pieces of plastic, weighing nearly 269,000 tons, are littering the world's oceans.

The study, which was published Tuesday in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, indicates that plastics will have the greatest impact where most seabirds are found, which is in the Southern Ocean, near Australia, South Africa, and South America.

But simple measures could curb the trend, such as finding ways to reduce plastic waste getting into the oceans, the researchers say.

"Because exposure to plastic turns out to be a strong predictor of how much plastic the birds have in them; that is, the more plastic they're exposed to, the more they ingest – this implies that if we reduce the amount of plastic going into the oceans, you would expect all these species to essentially respond,” Dr. Wilcox explained to BBC.

"And this makes this problem different from something like climate change. It ought to be relatively easy to fix."

Jenna Jambeck from the University of Georgia, an expert on plastic waste issues notes the link between basic waste management practices on land and the impacts being felt by seabirds.

"It illustrates that if we implement solutions to reduce plastic input into the oceans, we can reduce impacts to individual seabirds," Professor Jambeck told the BBC.

"Solutions include improving solid waste management where it is lacking, and also working upstream on product redesign and materials substitution moving towards a more circular system," Jambeck said.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.