Costa Rica uses 100% renewable energy for past 75 days. How are they doing it?

Costa Rica has managed to do away with fossil fuels, relying on hydropower and other forms of renewable energy instead. Could other countries follow suit?

Juan Carlos Ulate/Reuters
Costa Rica is looking to capitalize on its many volcanoes by investing in a new geothermal energy project.

The entire country of Costa Rica is currently running on completely renewable energy and has been for 75 days now. Relying mainly on hydropower, Costa Rica has not used any fossil fuels to generate electricity since the beginning of 2015.

The heavy rainfall over the past year has kept hydroplants busy enough to power nearly the whole country, with geothermal, wind, biomass, and solar energy making up the deficit, according to a press release from the Costa Rican Electricity Institute.

Granted, the Central American nation has several advantages over countries like the US in its ability to rely on renewable energy. Costa Rica is very small, with only 19.6 thousand square miles of land (about the size of West Virginia), and a population of less than five million people. Its energy needs are also lower because it does not have a manufacturing industry.

The switch to renewable energy makes economic sense for Costa Rica as well, given that its primary industries are agriculture and tourism, particularly eco-tourism. Not only is renewable energy cheaper than ever, using it will help protect the nation's assets.

However, Costa Rica’s dedication to renewable energy was at least partially out of necessity.

Along with several other Caribbean and Central American nations, Costa Rica had to scramble to find an alternative source of energy as Venezuela – which sold oil to neighboring nations at a discounted price for years – went bankrupt.

While total reliance on renewable energy may be more difficult for the rest of the world, significant strides have been made.

According to Quartz, Denmark currently gets 40 percent of its energy from wind, and wants to free itself from fossil fuel by 2050. Iceland gets all of its electricity from renewable energy sources, and about 85 percent of all its energy is produced by geothermal and hydropower sources. Sweden, Bulgaria, and Estonia have already hit their energy goals for 2020.

2014 was also the first year in nearly half a century that the global economy grew but the global CO2 emissions decreased. Typically, decreases in emissions are accompanied by an economic collapse.

The problem with complete reliance on renewable energy is that countries need backups in case natural resources dry up. Unreliable rain fall could seriously compromise Costa Rica’s ability to produce energy via hydropower. However, rather than reverting to fossil fuels, Costa Rica is looking to capitalize on its many volcanoes by investing in a massive geothermal energy project.

Costa Rica aims to be carbon-neutral by 2021.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.