Oil shows record growth. Will Obama 2.0 warm to fossil fuels?

Oil production in the US jumped by a record 800,000 barrels a day in 2012. As President Obama maps out his second term, he will have to decide how much to nurture the booming oil and gas industries.

Gregory Bull/AP/File
In this July 2011 file photo, Ben Shaw hangs from an oil derrick outside of Williston, N.D. Despite making tremendous strides in renewable innovation, the US is still wholly dependent on the oil and gas industry.

President Barack Obama champions renewables as the future of energy. The latest numbers tell a different tale.

Consumption of renewable energy in the US declined by 2.5 percent in 2012, according to the US Energy Information Administration, while US crude oil production jumped by a record 800,000 barrels a day over 2011. Production averaged 6.4 million barrels daily in 2012, and the EIA expects it to increase to 7.9 million barrels a day in 2014. That number would mark the highest annual average level of production since 1988.

Bolstered by new drilling techniques, natural gas inventories hit record highs in November 2012, but ended the year only slightly ahead of last year's level.

As the president maps out his second term, he will have to decide how much of his "all-of-the-above" approach to energy should nurture the booming oil and gas industries as opposed to renewables.

There are hints of a rapprochement between the president and the energy industry. Jack Gerard, president and CEO of the American Petroleum Institute, predicted Tuesday that Mr. Obama would soon act on whether to approve the Keystone XL pipelineEnergyWire reports. He added that he was "encouraged" by what he was hearing from the White House.

"The oil and natural gas industry has been a bright spot in the last few years of sluggish economic growth and listless job creation," Mr. Gerard said in the API's State of American Energy address, "and we are ready to do more." 

Oil and gas companies support 9.2 million jobs, according to Gerard. That number could increase 1.4 million by 2030 – that is, unless Washington gets in the way, Gerard said. "As Washington’s elected officials and opinion leaders search for common ground on tax policy, fiscal policy and regulatory regimes, we need to focus on solutions that will support our ability to provide for a secure American energy future."

With 2012's record-shattering temperatures and hurricane Sandy fresh in memory, Obama says he will work with environmentalists to curb the detrimental effects of heat-trapping carbon emissions. But he may do so cautiously, careful not to stifle job creation or US oil production's projected ascension to No. 1 in the world.

"If the message is somehow we’re going to ignore jobs and growth simply to address climate change, I don’t think anybody’s going to go for that," Obama said in a November press conference, his first after reelection. "I won’t go for that."

Last year's oil and renewable energy production numbers don't tell the whole story. Clean energy advocates take a longer view of the narrative, saying investments in wind and solar will pay off in the decades to come, as the technologies become cheaper and more flexible.

And there's promise in the short-term data for alternative energy, too. Wind-powered generation grew by 17 percent in 2012, the EIA reports, and consumption of solar energy is projected to have grown by 32 percent. Gains made in wind and solar, however, were more than offset by a 13.7 percent decrease in hydropower production.

The data is a stark reminder that despite making tremendous strides in renewable innovation, the US is still heavily dependent on fossil fuels for its energy. 

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Oil shows record growth. Will Obama 2.0 warm to fossil fuels?
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today