Can we protect 10 percent of the oceans? Momentum is growing.

An international goal is to set aside 10 percent of coastal and marine waters as protected areas by 2020. Although much work remains to reach the goal, areas are being added at an accelerated pace.

Jim Maragos/USFWS/AP
In this photo, pink coral is seen on the Palmyra Atoll in the Pacific. Parts of three remote and uninhabited Pacific island chains were set aside by President George W. Bush as national monuments to protect them from oil and gas extraction and commercial fishing.

Efforts to set aside conservation zones in the world's oceans are picking up steam, putting countries on a path to reach an international goal of setting aside 10 percent of coastal and marine waters as marine-protected areas by 2020.

That's the assessment of a report prepared by the Nature Conservancy and unveiled this month at a United Nations biodiversity conference in Hyderabad, India.

Marine-protected areas, or MPAs, generally are designed as free-swim zones for a wide range of ocean life, giving them havens to reproduce and grow without pressure from fishing or other ecologically disruptive human activities.

The ultimate goal is to ensure that the world's oceans maintain a healthy level of biological diversity even as they continue to serve the needs of millions of people who either make their living from fishing or rely on the sea as a main source of food.

In raw numbers, the extent of protected areas is small compared with available square miles of ocean, acknowledges Mark Spalding, senior marine scientist at the Nature Conservancy who led the team that pulled the data together. Indeed, MPAs currently cover far less than 1 percent of the world's oceans.

But the pace at which reserves are growing is picking up.

Between 2003 and 2007, MPAs grew at a rate of about 11.8 percent a year to cover about 2.5 million square kilometers (about 965,000 square miles). By 2010, MPAs covered about 4.8 million square kilometers, an average growth rate of 31 percent for each of the intervening three years. This year, MPAs cover about 8.2 million square kilometers, which would put the growth rate since 2010 at an average of 35 percent a year.

Over the next 12 to 24 months, another 5.2 million square kilometers could be added if the Cook Islands, Australia, and New Caledonia follow through on their plans to establish or expand protected areas.

Protected areas are being added so fast that "you can't keep up to date with these things," Dr. Spalding says. "It's a huge acceleration."

One reason the growth rate has picked up: A few countries have been picking the low-hanging fruit. They are preserving vast expanses of pristine marine ecosystems that are off the beaten nautical path.

For instance, twice during his second term, President George W. Bush set aside expanses of ocean falling within the US exclusive economic zones off northwestern Hawaii and the Mariana Islands in the Pacific.

Environmentalists hailed that move in no small part because keeping reefs in these areas as untouched as possible leaves them to serve as reference points for ecologists as they strive to restore stressed reefs elsewhere in the tropics. But the remoteness also meant that setting these areas aside presented relatively low opportunity costs politically compared with similar efforts along continental coasts.

Originally, nations had agreed to meeting the 10 percent coverage target by 2012. But by 2010, it was obvious that wasn't going to happen, Spalding explains. At a UN biodiversity conference that year in Nagoya, Japan, negotiators extended the deadline to 2020. But they also reworded the goals in ways aimed to provide more-specific direction on what was to be protected.

For instance, no longer was it enough merely to add patches of ocean anywhere. MPAs were to include regions that humans rely on for food or economic benefits, as well as regions that safeguard biodiversity. The new goals also noted that conservation efforts needed to reach deep inland to include areas whose runoff flows into the rivers that empty into coastal waters.

These represent the high-hanging fruit. These goals are difficult to achieve politically and so require close cooperation among all parties interested in using marine resources, ranging from fish underwater to offshore wind farms that seek to exploit ocean winds.

Some countries are moving in this direction, although generally the steps remain small, Spalding says. But word on the benefits of MPAs is getting around – from regional pacts, such as one signed in 2007 for a vast expanse of the western Pacific known as the Coral Triangle, to fisher-to-fisher exchanges in which those from well-managed marine areas share their experiences with those from poorly managed areas.

Referring to a well-designed MPA – one that brings benefits to the livelihoods of all the potential stakeholders – Spalding says: "If you get it right, you'll be generating such benefits for people that the whole system should snowball. People look over their shoulders, see an MPA down the road, and say: 'We want one of those.' "

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.