South Africa’s spark for clean governance

The country’s energy crisis compels the ruling party to embrace reforms - and humility - after years of corruption.

African National Congress (ANC) delegates attend a policy conference in Johannesburg, South Africa, July 29.

When the African National Congress (ANC) became South Africa’s first democratically elected ruling party in 1994, it promised that state-owned enterprises like utilities and the national airline would reflect “a public consciousness.” That meant that the companies would model the country’s diversity and be engines of shared prosperity.

Three decades later – with the ANC still in power – many of those enterprises are in shambles. One recent report found that public entities are hobbled by “crumbling infrastructure, poor and ever-changing leadership, corruption, wasteful expenditure and mismanagement of funds” and owe roughly $42 billion in debt.

The most conspicuous example is Eskom, the state electricity company. Its aging power plants and financial troubles have resulted in rolling blackouts – or “load shedding” – that put customers in the dark for up to 12 hours at a time. Yet that dysfunction may now have a silver lining: a corrective impulse toward honest government after years of unbridled graft.

At its midsummer party conference last weekend, the ANC backed a plan by President Cyril Ramaphosa allowing new private energy production. That signaled a shift away from the party’s conviction that only the state can fairly protect the public good – a belief shaped by the inequalities of the apartheid era, when the Black majority was largely excluded from the formal economy.

It also reflected a rare admission of failure and need for greater transparency in government. “Our weaknesses are evident in the distrust, the disillusionment, the frustration that is expressed by many toward [the ANC] movement and government,” Mr. Ramaphosa told the party gathering. “The people of South Africa will never forgive us if we abandon ... confronting wrongdoing within our ranks.”

That contrition may provide a model for other societies like Sri Lanka and Pakistan that are grappling with the economic damage caused by corruption and mismanagement. According to the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, 1 in 5 of the world’s largest enterprises are state-owned. That marks an upward trend. At their best, public entities can seed the development of new industries and ensure the provision of essential public services. But they can undermine competition and are prone to abuse.

Mr. Ramaphosa is attempting to uproot a culture of corruption in the ANC that cost the state an estimated $17 billion during the nine-year presidency of his predecessor, Jacob Zuma. A government inquiry found that state entities like Eskom were portals for graft and abuse.

As it turns out, an acute energy emergency and its economic consequences may be the spark for needed reform. “The crisis that we are facing ... is a call for all South Africans to be part of the solution,” Mr. Ramaphosa said in a national address last month.

An entrenched ruling party that opinion polls show has lost the public’s faith may be starting to restore the public good above its own. That reset starts with the humility to see that societies build through honest and shared enterprise.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

QR Code to South Africa’s spark for clean governance
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today