Local givers rise to the COVID-19 challenge

Of all charitable grants given to meet the needs during the pandemic last year, more than half came from community foundations.

|
AP
Volunteers carry food to waiting cars at a mobile food pantry in West Valley City, Utah.

A Gallup Poll in December noted a sharp rise in the number of Americans who would prefer to live in smaller localities. Nearly 50% would choose a town or rural area rather than a city or suburb. That’s up from 39% two years ago, or before COVID-19. During times of national upheaval like a pandemic, Gallup noted, more people search for safety in less-crowded places. These are also communities with higher levels of trust where people tend to know each other, often providing what Abraham Lincoln called “the bonds of affection.”

This new preference for smaller communities fits with another trend over the past year. Of the more than $20 billion in charitable grants provided for COVID-19 relief, more than half were given by hundreds of community foundations. These are local philanthropies whose pots of money range from $100,000 to $1.7 billion, while the median grant size is only about $10,000. With their on-the-ground knowledge, community foundations are better able than national institutions to listen to the needs of local people. In 2020, their work was supported by more than 1,000 charity groups created in response to COVID-19, such as new food banks.

“Philanthropy has responded to COVID-19 like no other crisis in recent memory,” states a report by two charity-related groups, Candid and the Center for Disaster Philanthropy, that included a tracking of community foundations.

The report explains that many communities already have “highly resilient support networks” that can be easily reached by donors. This is especially true for marginalized Americans. More than a third of philanthropy for COVID-19 relief went to Black and Indigenous communities, and other minority groups.

“If a large giver can support a community foundation, then the [everyday] gifts can flow through with little or no overhead,” said Bill Gates of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation at a seminar last month. He refers to local giving as “deep engagement.”

Local giving is hardly new. “Giving circles” that rely on individuals in a community sprang up in the 1980s. By 2017, they numbered more than 1,600 in the U.S. Last year’s post-Thanksgiving donation day known as Giving Tuesday netted an estimated $2.47 billion, a 25% increase over 2019, with much of that money going to local needs. The internet has helped local givers to better pool their donations for greater impact.

Yet “COVID-19 has inspired a groundswell of response to human need,” wrote a group of philanthropy scholars in the Stanford Social Innovation Review. “These expanded ways of giving promote greater participation and reshape the meaning of citizenship.” They are also expanding the bonds between people within communities in the spirit of what Lincoln called “charity for all.”

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Local givers rise to the COVID-19 challenge
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Commentary/the-monitors-view/2021/0311/Local-givers-rise-to-the-COVID-19-challenge
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe