An apology ricochets in the Koreas

Long portrayed as infallible, North Korea’s leader apologizes for the killing of a South Korean. His move from myth-making to truth-telling opens a door for peace.

AP
South Koreans watch a Sept. 25 news program about North Korean leader Kim Jong Un apologizing for the killing of a South Korean official.

Hard conflicts sometimes need the soft touch of truth. That could now be the case for the two Koreas, which have been at odds for 70 years, either in all-out war or frequent violent encounters.

On Sept. 25, in a rare admission of fallibility, the “supreme leader” of North Korea apologized to the South Korean people. Kim Jong Un wrote in a letter that he was sorry for his military shooting a South Korean official found floating in the sea a few days earlier.

He also admitted the killing “will clearly” have a negative impact on inter-Korean relations. In the spirit of reconciliation, Mr. Kim promised such incidents would not recur.

Was his apology sincere? Or merely a self-serving charm offensive to split South Korea from its ally, the United States, which is deeply concerned about North Korea’s nuclear arsenal?

At the least, his apparent contrition lies in contrast to a similar incident in 2008, when a South Korean tourist was killed after straying into a North Korean military area. Mr. Kim’s father, Kim Jong Il and ruler at the time, did not apologize.

In addition to the apology, this third member of the Kim family to rule seems to be chafing under the aura of infallible leadership handed down in the propaganda machine set up by his grandfather, Kim Il Sung. (As part of the dynasty’s deification, all North Koreans must wear lapel pins with images of the late Kims.)

As with many leaders who rely on a personality cult, the humility to admit mistakes is often seen as a weakness – and dangerous. Yet in August, Mr. Kim told his people that his 2016 economic plan had failed due in part to his government’s “shortcomings.” In a country where it is a crime to criticize policy, Mr. Kim’s honest self-reflection could open a door for others to do so.

Last March, Mr. Kim told propaganda workers to move away from the “mystification” of him and focus more on his “human” side. If the people are mesmerized by a leader, he wrote, that might cover up the truth.

Three days after Mr. Kim’s apology, South Korean President Moon Jae-in followed suit. He apologized to his own people for his government’s failure to protect the citizen killed by North Korea. He said Mr. Kim’s apology opens an opportunity for dialogue. He proposed the two countries jointly investigate the incident.

Small gestures like an apology can often turn around a broken relationship. They hint that someone is willing to change. They help break down stereotypes of “the other” and point to a shared reality of truth and even affection. The Koreas have a long path to a permanent peace. Yet when leaders come off their false pedestals, it can set peace in motion.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.