Germany looks in the mirror, again

The governing party’s collusion with a far-right party sets off a reaction that signals Germans are still on the lookout for fascist tendencies.

AP
AfD parliamentary party leader Bjoern Hoecke, right, shakes hands with Thomas Kemmerich of the Free Democrats, in Erfurt, Germany, Feb. 5.

During her 15 years as Germany’s leader, Angela Merkel has put out many fires to save Europe. She stopped Russia’s advance in Ukraine, for example, forced Greece to end its financial profligacy, and halted Poland’s assault on judicial independence. She sees protecting the European Union and its values as part of Germany’s “work” in reconciling with its neighbors after the Nazi era.

Now, 75 years after World War II and as Chancellor Merkel prepares to step down next year, she is being forced to put out one more big fire – this time in Germany itself.

On Feb. 5, her governing party, the Christian Democratic Union, broke a big taboo in German politics and worked with the far-right Alternative for Germany (AfD) party to install a regional premier in the small state of Thuringia. The collusion of local CDU leaders with a party widely viewed as fascist and xenophobic was seen as a sudden reversal of decades of moral cleansing among Germans.

“It was a bad day for democracy,” said Ms. Merkel. She added that the taboo-breaking event was “unforgivable.”

Indeed, the reaction to this event also reveals just how far Germany will go to avoid slipping back into a dark past.

Across the country, protests were held to oppose the CDU’s action. The new premier of Thuringia, Thomas Kemmerich, was forced to resign soon after taking office. A liberal, he also promised elections “to remove the stain of the AfD’s support for the office of the premiership.”

In addition, the crisis led to the resignation of head of the CDU, Annegret Kramp-Karrenbauer, who was the chancellor’s chosen successor. She blamed her downfall on the “unresolved” issue of how her conservative party deals with Germany’s extremist parties.

Both the CDU and its junior coalition partner, the center-left Social Democratic Party, are now asking themselves how mainstream politicians can better respond to the rise of the AfD. Started in 2013, that party has gained seats in the parliaments of all 16 states, especially after Ms. Merkel’s decision in 2015 to allow more than 1 million largely Middle Eastern refugees into Germany. The anti-immigrant backlash, as well as slow economic growth in Germany’s former communist east, has driven many people to vote for extremist parties. AfD’s popularity is about 14%.

According to polls, most Germans do not want Ms. Merkel to leave office in 2021, as she desires. Such a view implies a wide preference for centrist – and anti-fascist – politics to persist. If the chancellor can put out this latest big fire, the “work” of reconciliation with the rest of Europe can continue, with a renewed focus on Germans themselves.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.