In G20 protests, a different view of extremism

Violent protests in Hamburg revealed the rise in left-wing extremism in Germany. But the challenge of the extremist mind-set – either left- or right-wing – is in many ways the same worldwide.   

Daniel Bockwoldt/AP
A man looks through the broken window of a shop in Hamburg, Germany, Saturday, after antiglobalization activists rioted during the G20 meetings.

For Germans, in particular, last weekend was eye-opening. 

For some time, the country has been concerned about its far-right political fringe. Recent years have seen rallies by Pegida, an anti-Islamic group, gain momentum, as well as those by the far-right Alternative for Germany party. Germany, it seemed, was in the midst of its own turn to the populist right.

But at the Group of 20 summit last weekend, something entirely different came to the fore: left-wing extremism. Germans were shocked by what they saw in the streets of Hamburg: protesters turning the event into a gallery of water cannons and broken glass. 

We’ve seen this before, at the 1999 Seattle World Trade Organization protests, at President Trump's inauguration, and elsewhere: a class of hardened left-wing protesters turning free expression into something darker. The German Ministry recently concluded: “In the past few years the acceptance and intensity of violence in the far-left scene has noticeably increased. This is especially true of violence against police and political enemies (particularly real or imagined right-wing extremists.),” according to the German news agency Deutsche Welle.

The point is not to chart right-wing and left-wing violence in order to assign blame and decide which is worse. The point is to recognize that extremism in whatever form is a red flag – a signal that sections of society are feeling so impotent and adrift that they see no choice but to resort to violence and extremist ideologies. 

One expert has long seen more similarities than differences among extremists. Daniel Koehler of the German Institute on Radicalization and De-radicalization Studies has worked with neo-Nazis and Islamic State recruits. 

“They talk a lot about justice. They talk a lot about freedom. They want to change the society into a positive direction. They believe that they're doing something good for humanity,” he told NPR.

Indeed, for many radicals, violence is a desperate, though misguided, step to do good, he said. “Positive aspects like quest for significance, justice, help [for the] poor, [defense of] women and children, Syria, delivering humanitarian aid,” he said. 

What kindles violence is the mix with the negative: “they have not felt that they are part of a society,” Mr. Koehler said. 

Koehler’s answer: Flip the equation. Take away the bad influences and turn up the volume on the good, like finding role models for extremists to look up to, he told the Monitor’s Warren Richey for his ISIS in America series.  

“The only thing we can do is build up the family or the social environment as a counterforce,” he said. “That is the only way we can succeed.”

It might sound like Parenting 101. In many ways, it is. And that puts the battle against extremism of all stripes in a different light.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.