Can Colombia’s peace help Venezuela’s conflict?

As a peace deal helps end a long war in Colombia, Venezuela is descending into violence. What can Colombia teach its neighbor about healing and reconciliation?

AP Photo
Women in Bogotá hug during a rally in support of the peace deal signed last November between rebels of the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia, FARC, and Colombia's President Juan Manuel Santos.

Five months after ending Latin America’s longest guerrilla war, Colombia has finally set up a truth commission, a type of panel that other post-conflict countries have tried in hopes of healing social wounds. Thousands of perpetrators of violence on all sides will be invited to confess and also offer compensation to victims – 8 million of them – in return for some forgiveness. Only those who committed the most heinous crimes will be tried. If the process can find a balance between justice and mercy, it will help bring a measure of reconciliation to a country at war since the mid-1960s.

Yet the truth commission, along with other parts of a 2016 historic peace deal, could achieve another purpose. Colombia’s peace process might give hope to neighboring Venezuela. That country is quickly plunging into violence between pro-democracy protesters and the security forces of an autocratic leader, President Nicolás Maduro.

Venezuela’s rising violence has already brought some attempts at mediation and reconciliation. Much of the rest of Latin America, for example, seeks a new election in Venezuela. And in a poignant message, the son of the country’s pro-government human rights ombudsman used a YouTube video this week to call on his father, Tarek Saab, to “end the injustice that has sunk this country.”

“I ask you as your son, and in the name of Venezuela that you represent, that you reflect and do what you must do. I understand, I know this isn’t easy, but it’s right, the right thing to do,” said Yibram Saab, who has been a victim of the government crackdown on protesters.

In Colombia, victims were purposely placed at the center of the peace negotiations, which began in 2012. And as the rebels of the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia hand over their weapons and reenter society from their jungle outposts, the victims will again be at the center of ensuring peace through the commission’s work in revealing the truth about past violence.

The peace deal’s post-conflict bodies will offer “a guarantee for all those thousands of victims who have spent years and decades waiting for answers,” says President Juan Manuel Santos. “What the victims most strongly demand – before reparation and justice – is the truth.”

Not many countries with truth commissions have succeeded in bringing many confessions by perpetrators to satisfy war victims. Yet Colombia’s peace deal is thoughtful and detailed, and despite initial delays, appears on track. And it has attracted attention from other post-conflict countries.

In a recent visit to Bogotá, Irish President Michael Higgins compared Colombia’s process to the one in Northern Ireland. He said a lasting peace requires an “honest engagement” in understanding and exposing the conflict’s past. A reconciliation process must recognize the hurts of the past, he added, but also help in the realization that the “future is alive with possibilities not yet born, from which no version of past conflicts should preclude us.”

That is the sort of message that Venezuela could use from Colombia.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.