A model for anti-corruption Russians

The March 26 protests in dozens of Russian cities were not simply against the corruption under President Putin. Many demonstrators also know how another former Soviet state, Georgia, has achieved relatively clean governance. 

Reuters
Anti-corruption protesters attend a rally in Moscow, Russia, March 26.

Of all the former states in the Soviet Union, according to a global ranking, Russia remains one of the most corrupt. That helps explain why an estimated 60,000 Russians took to the streets March 26 in anti-corruption protests. Not only were these the largest protests in five years, they took place in dozens of cities and despite the fact that officials denied permits for the demonstrations and the government has been cracking down hard on dissidents.

What stirred the thinking of so many Russians to envision an honest and accountable government?

While President Vladimir Putin remains popular, the focus of the protests was his prime minister and protégé, Dmitry Medvedev. A scathing report on his wealth, released on YouTube in early March and watched by more than 12 million people, revealed the depth of Russian corruption – and Mr. Putin’s vulnerability to mass dissent. One sign of Putin’s worry: His security forces arrested more than a thousand demonstrators, including anti-corruption activist Alexei Navalny. He’s the one who compiled the corruption file on the prime minister.

Another reason for the size of the crowds is the fact that average wealth in Russia has fallen about 42 percent since 2013, a result largely of Putin’s policies. Yet there may be another cause. In one former Soviet state – neighboring Georgia – anti-corruption protests achieved remarkable success, a fact not lost on many Russians.

Georgia’s so-called Rose Revolution in 2003 overthrew a very corrupt regime and ushered in wholesale reforms aimed mainly at curbing low-level corruption. The traffic police, the face of daily bribery to the people, were all fired. In addition, taxes were simplified and the number of required permits was cut from 600 to a few dozen. The number of state workers fell by 50 percent while the salaries of the remaining workers were boosted. To hold officials accountable, the transparency of government transactions was greatly improved. And all this despite Georgia being one of the poorest of the former Soviet states.

Last year, Georgia was judged to be one of the least-corrupt countries in Central Asia and Europe. On the Corruption Perceptions Index of the group Transparency International, it ranks near Spain, Latvia, and Costa Rica. Over the course of three governments since 2003, noted a January report by the Council of Europe, “Georgia has come a long way in creating a regulatory and institutional framework for fighting corruption.”

The country still has corruption challenges, mainly in the judiciary. One in 8 Georgians says corruption is one of the nation’s top three problems. But the country has achieved what The Economist magazine calls a “mental revolution.” Perhaps more Russians want what their neighbors in Georgia already enjoy.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.