World Bank takes on pernicious beliefs

Its development report asks why certain harmful beliefs persist and suggests ways to shape people’s preferences to ensure progress. First task: Challenge the idea of power with the power of ideas. 

Reuters
Farmers march to demand the resignation of Guatemala President Jimmy Morales and against the politicians involved with the Odebrecht bribery scheme, in Guatemala City, Guatemala, March 7.

As the largest global actor for uplifting the poor, the World Bank has wondered for decades why certain harmful beliefs persist in hindering progress. Like other aid agencies, the bank has spent billions in many countries, applying “best practices” and nudging changes in governance. On women’s rights, for example, foreign aid has made major changes worldwide. Yet, as the bank points out, about 90 percent of 173 countries still have at least one law that holds women back, such as requiring a husband’s permission to work.

Finally, in its 2017 World Development Report, the bank took a hard look at how to better understand and change the beliefs of citizens as well as the “elite” that govern them. The big conclusion: “Understanding their motivations is what matters to anticipating their conduct.”

Progress, in other words, depends on first listening to the values of people, such as their tolerance for domestic violence or corruption, and then finding ways to introduce alternative views that can change expectations. Passing a law often does not work. Bangladesh, for example, had a law on gender quotas for two decades before it was implemented.

Laws, of course, do often change behavior, provide a check on authority, and allow a contest of ideas. “Law provides a clear reference in the midst of diverging views,” the report states. “People comply with the law because doing so facilitates social and economic activities.”

Yet to adapt and accept progress, people must learn how ideas, such as equality before the law, can reshape beliefs and cultural practices. “Changes in preferences occur slowly over extended periods, such as global trends over centuries to view the practices of slavery and torture as immoral,” the report states. It is not always good to simply change a country’s power structure and laws without first transforming norms and beliefs.

“The idea of power cannot be understood without taking seriously the power of ideas,” the bank advises. A society needs a shared commitment to transparency and accountability for the best ideas to become widely accepted and then put to work. A good example is how the people of Guatemala, as part of negotiations to end a civil war, decided to demand honesty in government leaders. They set up a United Nations-backed commission to go after criminal groups that had infiltrated government. The result: Once-corrupt judges felt social pressure to end the practice of impunity for officials. Even a president was felled in 2015.

A society makes progress in its security, growth, and equity when people’s beliefs shift toward the common good and when everyone is allowed to participate in decision-making. Fixing laws and institutions is not always the solution.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.