An early test of Trump’s ‘America First’ at the UN

In its first confrontation with Russia, the Trump administration stands up for a long-held American value of protecting innocent life in conflicts. 

Human Rights Watch provided this photo that purportedly shows the remnant of a yellow gas cylinder found in Masaken Hanano, Aleppo, after a chlorine attack on Nov.18, 2016.

When President Trump first proclaimed an “America First” approach to foreign affairs, it was not clear if he meant the American people or American values. But after his first confrontation with Russia at the United Nations, the meaning may be a bit more clear.

On Feb. 28, the US ambassador to the UN, Nikki Haley, put forth a resolution in the Security Council to punish Syria for its latest use of chemical weapons on civilians in a war that has lasted nearly six years. The Trump administration, along with Western allies, was alarmed at a new UN report that found Syrian helicopters had dropped internationally banned chlorine bombs in residential areas last year, resulting in hundreds of civilian casualties.

“The continued use of chlorine by Syrian forces evinces a blatant disregard for international legal obligations, and also amounts to the war crime of indiscriminate attacks against a civilian population,” the UN report stated.

Russia and China vetoed the measure, which would have imposed a travel ban and asset freeze on 11 Syrian military commanders and officials. The veto then evoked this response from Ms. Haley: “It is a sad day on the Security Council when members start making excuses for other member states killing their own people.”

The resolution, along with the ambassador’s words, were a clear assertion of an international norm designed to avoid the use of mass weapons that can easily cause indiscriminate killing of civilians. The norm applies especially to chemical and biological weapons. In 1925, after the chemical attacks of World War I, much of the world began to endorse protocols against the use and stockpiling of such weapons. The latest protocol, the 1997 Chemical Weapons Convention, has been endorsed by 192 nations.

The United States has long been a champion of humanitarian rules for the protection of innocent people from indiscriminate harm in war. Its security forces, such as the remote pilots of predatory drones, are trained to honor this value. And any erosion of the international taboo has brought instinctive responses by previous US presidents. 

The Trump administration seems to have joined this chorus, standing up for values not only American but widely shared by other nations. If that’s putting America first, bring it on.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

QR Code to An early test of Trump’s ‘America First’ at the UN
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today