Canada’s response to a mosque massacre

The killing of six Muslims in Quebec brought vigils, prayers, and other moments of solidarity between mosques and churches. This reaction often plays out worldwide because houses of worship find common purpose against acts of hate.

People light candles as they attend a Jan. 30 vigil in honor of the victims of a shooting in a mosque in Quebec City, Quebec.

When a house of worship is attacked, the response often brings more than the usual outrage over such an act of hate. Sacred places, after all, whether a mosque, church, temple, or synagogue, are supposed to be free of fear and full of love. For Canadians, a Jan. 29 shooting at a mosque in Quebec City that killed six Muslims certainly provoked anger. But another response showed just how much places of worship have in common as lights against the dark.

Across Canada, churches and mosques reached out with vigils and prayers in a spirit of solidarity to protect their spiritual havens. An Anglican minister in Aylmer, Quebec, for example, organized a vigil outside a mosque that brought together hundreds of different faiths. In Winnipeg, the Manitoba Islamic Association opened its doors for visitors. In Gatineau, Quebec, people walked from the cathedral to the mosque.

In Sudbury, Ontario, the Islamic Association asked for solidarity with this statement: “The sanctity of all houses of God in Canada must be protected by every citizen committed to peaceful living from any form of violation, let alone the heinous crime of killing individuals during the act of prayer.” (Police who arrested a Laval University student after the mosque shooting said it was an act of terror.)

Such responses are hardly unique to Canada. In the United States, attacks on religious centers often bring a strong ecumenical reaction, such as after the killings at a black church in Charleston, South Carolina, in 2015, or a Sikh temple in Oak Creek, Wis., in 2012. When a mosque mysteriously burned down Jan. 28 in Victoria, Texas, thousands of people of different faiths quickly contributed nearly $1 million to rebuild it.

In Nigeria, after terrorist attacks by Boko Haram on churches and mosques, many Christians and Muslims began to guard each other’s places of worship. In Kenya, mosques and churches in the Kibera slum of Nairobi painted their walls yellow in solidarity and in defiance of attacks by the Islamist terror group Al Shabab.

In Iraq, a series of major attacks on both Sunni and Shiite mosques in 2006 led leaders of both groups to demand a halt to such terrorism. “All houses of worship are sacrosanct, including mosques and the non-Muslim houses of worship of all faiths and religions,” stated the group in what is called the Mecca Charter.

In every society, religious centers provide support and solace that many people cannot find in the home, at a workplace, or from government. A tragic attack on one house of worship is easily seen as an attack on all – as well as the spiritual resources they provide. The response in Canada to the mosque killings was yet another reminder that different faiths have a common purpose, especially to roll back hate.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

QR Code to Canada’s response to a mosque massacre
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today