Syrian-Americans: model immigrants?

A study of earlier immigrants from Syria finds them ‘doing very well’ and should ease concerns about recent refugees.

Muhammad Hamed/Reuters
A second-hand shoes dealer poses as he waits for customers at his shop at the Al Zaatari refugee camp in the Jordanian city of Mafraq, near the border with Syria on Dec.18, 2016. REUTERS/

A US pledge to accept 10,000 refugees from war-torn Syria was achieved last summer. In all, the country has admitted more than 15,000 Syrian refugees since January 2014.

That’s a tiny fraction of the 4.8 million Syrian refugees who have fled a brutal civil war to find asylum around the world. Yet, in a US election year, even this modest commitment managed to stoke controversy and raise continuing questions over whether these refugees would become a burden, or even a danger, to American society.

An indicator of how these new arrivals may do in the United States is found in data on the 90,000 Syrian immigrants who have been in America over a much longer period of time. It shows them to be nothing short of a model group of new Americans.

“[I]mmigrants from Syria who live in the United States are in fact doing very well. They are learning English, getting good jobs, owning homes, and starting businesses at impressive rates,” say the authors of an analysis of these earlier Syrian immigrants conducted by the Fiscal Policy Institute and the Center for American Progress. “These findings are reassuring and should provide the basis for more informed and thoughtful consideration of how to think about current and future Syrian immigrants and refugees,” the analysis concludes.

Takeaways from the report include the following:

Syrian immigrants in the US earn a good living, with a median annual wage of $52,000. This compares very favorably with the $36,000 median wage for all immigrants in the workforce and the average $45,000 annual median wage for workers born in the US, the analysis says.

Syrian immigrants are often entrepreneurs and have a high rate of business ownership. Some 3 percent of people born in the US own their own businesses; more than 11 percent of Syrian immigrants do.

Syrian-Americans tend to be well-educated, too. More than a quarter (27 percent) of Syrian-born men in the US hold advanced college degrees (master’s degree or higher).

After living in the US for at least 20 years, the data show, more than 90 percent of Syrian immigrants have become US citizens, a rate about 20 percent higher than that of US immigrants in general.

This thriving Syrian-American community should provide a solid base of support for the new Syrian refugees. The report cites the example of the Syrian-American club of Houston, a nonprofit group of largely professionals that helps new arrivals fill out job applications, drives them to job interviews, and raises funds for academic scholarships.

Despite the recent political campaign rhetoric that has raised fears about immigrants, Americans’ opinions toward these newcomers have actually become more favorable in recent years, according to a survey by the Pew Research Center. Nearly two-thirds (63 percent) of adults in the US today say they think that in general immigrants have a positive influence because of the hard work and the talents they bring with them. Only about one-fourth of Americans (27 percent) expect immigrants to have a negative influence on the US (i.e., take jobs away from Americans or burden social services such as the health-care system).

That’s nearly a complete reversal of attitudes from the 1990s, the Pew center points out, when 63 percent of Americans thought immigrants were a burden on America and only 31 percent said they strengthened the nation.

The US has taken in Syrian refugees to do its part in what is a worldwide humanitarian effort. The motive has not been to necessarily benefit economically. Still this new research into how earlier Syrian immigrants have fared can only strengthen confidence that these new arrivals will become a positive force in American life.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.