Tweet less, talk more

Real conversations – in person – are still needed for understanding, especially for world leaders. Donald Trump’s tweets, such as those about China, are no substitute for meaningful dialogue.

AP Photo
The front pages of Chinese newspapers reflect the official reaction of China to President-elect Donald Trump's tweets touching on sensitive issues, such as Taiwan.

Like most of us with smartphones, President-elect Donald Trump is learning a big pitfall in relying on social media: It is no substitute for real conversation. His frequent use of Twitter during the presidential campaign was helpful in learning about his views. But as Mr. Trump will soon command the world’s most powerful position, he must rely more on old-fashioned talking – listening, persuading, even emphasizing. For a president to use a one-way tweet – at 140 characters – is more like a dart than a dialogue.

Case in point: Trump recently sent out tweets that challenge both China and a long-held agreement with the United States about the status of Taiwan. While that US policy is troublesome in isolating a democratic and de facto independent country, Trump’s signaling in a tweet that he might overturn this policy came as a shock to Beijing, creating uncertainty and counterthreats.

Loose comments between rivals, without the benefit of full conversation, can start wars. After close military encounters in the 1990s, China and the US realized they must hold frequent dialogues at the highest levels to better understand each other’s interests and avoid a war they might regret. Those “strategic” talks have continued under three presidents, keeping a relative peace in Asia. The talks are in-depth and secret, allowing each side to compromise and avoid losing face.

World and political affairs, like close personal relationships, cannot be mediated through tweets, texts, or Facebook postings. During this year’s presidential debates, for example, candidates seemed more eager to utter bite-size quotes suitable for YouTube than engage with each other’s ideas in back-and-forth conversations.

“We are being silenced by our technologies, in a way, ‘cured of talking’,” writes Sherry Turkle, a professor at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and author of a recent book, “Reclaiming Conversation: The Power of Talk in a Digital Age.” Ms. Turkle suggests that the constant distraction of cellphones is really “a flight from conversation that is also a flight from self-reflection, empathy, and mentorship.” She quotes Henry David Thoreau who said he had three chairs in his home: “One for solitude, two for friendship, three for society.”

Social media is great at enhancing a feeling of connection. But it is not great for conversation. And as anyone who has seen people checking their phones at a dinner party, it can hinder conversations. In governance, too, it is imperative for leaders to talk more and tweet less.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

QR Code to Tweet less, talk more
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today