Tunisia's hopes for truth to set it free

To reconcile a nation torn by a brutal past, victims of past oppression in Tunisia are allowed to air their experiences in hopes their repressors will repent. A ‘truth’ commission aims to prevent cycles of revenge, setting a model for the Middle East.

AP Photo
The president of the Truth and Dignity Commission, Sihem Bensedrine, holds a Nov. 14 press conference in Tunis, Tunisia. Tunisians who faced abuses under decades of authoritarian rule have publicly aired their grievances to a special commission seeking to reconcile lingering tensions after a democratic revolution.

As Iraqi troops move closer to retaking the city of Mosul from Islamic State, one concern is that the mainly Shiite forces might exact revenge on Sunni civilians suspected of having supported the militant group. Revenge remains a powerful precept in Middle East conflicts. Islamic State itself justifies its vicious acts as permissible retribution for historical grievances. Yet in a sharp break from this tradition, one Arab country has displayed a potentially peaceful alternative.

For two days last week, people in the North African nation of Tunisia were glued to their TVs and radios listening to the accounts of victims of torture and other violence committed by previous brutal dictatorships for nearly half a century. Since 2010, when Tunisians sparked the Arab Spring in a popular revolt against the last dictator, Tunisia has struggled to start a democracy while also setting up a Truth and Dignity Commission to bring justice to victims and reconcile the nation.

Many of those who spoke to the commission last week were grateful for a chance to reveal their experience. Some hoped their perpetrators might admit their violent deeds, which then could trigger forgiveness. “The truth, whatever we do, is revolutionary,” said one victim of torture, the author Gilbert Naccache.

The head of the commission, Sihem Bensedrine, made clear the purpose of the testimonies was “not revenge.” And a leading Islamic figure and head of the Ennahda party, Rashid Ghannouchi said the hearings were a sign “that Tunisia is on the right track to treating its sicknesses and wounds in civilized, and not vengeful, ways.” The message to the world, he added, is that Tunisia can deal with its crises peacefully, rejecting reciprocal retaliation out of anger.

Until last week, the commission had taken testimony in secret from about 11,000 people considered victims of the regimes of Zine el-Abidine Ben Ali and Habib Bourguiba. Such an airing of past injustices is a unique experiment in the Arab world, especially as it aims for social healing and a renewal of faith in state institutions.

“If you ask me personally, I just want the truth and for this black period to be written down so this does not happen again. At least our sons and daughters would not have to live this way,” said one testifier, Sami Brahim.

The panel will hold two more public hearings, in December and January, on significant anniversaries of the democratic revolution five years ago. It will then make recommendations for reforms and pursue reparations for victims. From this process, hopes Ms. Bensedrine, “Tunisia will not accept human rights abuses after today.”

Countries coming out of conflict and repression too often take the path of vengeance. Yet, finds Brian Klaas at the London School of Economics, those that seek ways to include controversial groups and figures – after seeking the truth about past atrocities and repentance from oppressors – are better able to find peace and reconciliation.

This is a lesson sorely needed to help the Middle East avoid cycles of violence, such as in Iraq, Syria, and Yemen. Tunisia is again setting an example for Arab states with a new kind of "spring," only this time for healing.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Tunisia's hopes for truth to set it free
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today