Peace pact 2.0 to end Colombia’s war

In one of the grandest experiments in restorative justice, Colombia has a new peace pact aimed at ending a long war. The key element that was missing: restitution to victims by the war’s perpetrators.

Reuters
Supporters rallying for the nation’s new peace agreement with FARC, during a Nov. 15 march in Bogota, Colombia.

The practice of “restorative justice” has steadily spread around the world over the past quarter century, both in resolving normal crimes as well as in helping countries coming out of a conflict. In the United States, at least 35 states now promote this use of dialogue, reparations, and reconciliation between crime victims and their perpetrators. But the most visible and massive attempt to use it is in Colombia, which seeks to end a 52-year war. Getting it right has not come easy, but Colombia’s likely success could become a model for other conflict zones.

In a surprise vote last month, Colombians shot down the government’s proposed peace deal with Marxist rebels that included some leniency for the group’s 6,000 guerrillas still in jungle hide-outs. The “no” side demanded that the rebels of the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC) be more active in supporting the war’s victims.

Stunned by the vote, President Juan Manuel Santos quickly negotiated a new deal with FARC. On Monday, a new agreement was announced, one that adopts many of the complaints of the original pact’s opponents. The key addition: The rebels promise to declare and hand over all their assets – mostly earned from drug trafficking and kidnapping – that will then be used for reparations to victims.

The first pact had included most of the main elements of restorative justice: truth telling about crimes, a commitment to not return to violence, and a system of justice that balances punishment with forgiveness. But the rebels were not required to assist Colombian society in becoming whole again by helping to heal the lives of their victims. Now they bear a burden to repair the country, a form of punitive justice that goes beyond jail time.

The rebels also agreed to more stringent forms of confinement for those convicted of crimes by a special tribunal. And they will still be welcomed to participate in politics and hold seats in Congress, a concession to the group’s longtime political goals. “The reason for all peace processes in the world is precisely so that guerrillas leave their arms and can participate in politics legally,” Mr. Santos said.

The new pact is expected to be approved by Congress soon. The alternative to a peace pact was more war. The rebels might have lost that war someday but instead they have now volunteered to give up their arms – and provide restitution.

At the heart of restorative justice is the concept of a perpetrator willingly admitting his or her wrongs and putting things right, not only for victims but for the well-being of the wider community.

Admitting one’s mistakes and making amends can help lessen the wounds of a war. If Colombia’s attempt at this form of justice succeeds, it may make it easier for other countries, such as Syria, to gain peace.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.