The task ahead for the 2016 election winners

The American political mood is dark and pessimistic just now. This will force those elected in November to listen even more to those they oppose. What they find may surprise them.

AP Photo
Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton shakes hands with Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump at the Oct. 20 Alfred E. Smith Memorial Foundation Dinner.

The 2016 presidential election has left a strong impression of the United States as a fractured, gloomy nation. Nearly two-thirds of Americans say neither major party represents them, according to the latest American Values Survey, while 74 percent are pessimistic about the country’s direction – up from 57 percent just four years ago.

Nearly three-fourths say the country is either stagnating or falling behind, according to a Time magazine poll. Even among young adults under 30, more than half are fearful for the future, according to a Harvard University poll.

This mood of pessimism, says Henry Olsen, a senior fellow at the Ethics and Public Policy Center, requires that the winners of the election listen to the views of people who think differently from them. “It is one thing to say that ‘we are going to have a debate and you lost.’ It is another thing to say that ‘it is not even proper to express your concerns, your concerns that are so far out of my understanding.’ ... That is a recipe for social division.”

Listening, however, is not just learning a bit more about what you oppose and then trying to split the difference in a transactional deal. It can also mean understanding how Americans are turning their disappointment with politics into new forms of civic activity. If they are not finding the social goods they seek through elections, they must be looking for them elsewhere. Organized movements like the tea party or Black Lives Matter don’t fade away if they lose an election. They often morph into affirmative and local action.

We have seen these alternative means of civic engagement show up on the margins of politics. New communities have formed, often on the internet, around local food, alternative energy, home-schooling, or work sharing. Americans don’t simply stew in political resentment. They create new paths, outside official democracy, to find people of similar interests and values. The Digital Age has accelerated this trend to redefine what is public.

These alternative civic bonds do not merely fill the gaps of government services. They can create whole new communities, cutting across the traditional political divisions. As Barack Obama said in 2008, Americans “must always believe that they can write their own destiny.”

These are acts of love, not hate. They are based on hope, not gloom. The 2016 election winners do indeed have work to do in listening to the currents of American society that are moving ahead on their own. A good leader tries to run ahead of the people in the direction they are going.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to The task ahead for the 2016 election winners
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Commentary/the-monitors-view/2016/1026/The-task-ahead-for-the-2016-election-winners
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe