Addressing fears of would-be migrants

Both the US and the EU are trying a new approach to mass migration: reducing the fear or desperation of people tempted to flee their country. For the US, the tactic may be working in Central America.

AP Photo
Vice President Joe Biden shake hands with the President of El Salvador, Salvador S'nchez Cer'n, during a North Triangle forum accompanied by from left,Honduras President Juan Orlando Hern'ndez and Guatemala President Jimmy Morales, at the Inter-American Development Bank headquarters in Washington Sept. 23.

Last year, the United States and European Union each adopted a new kind of response to the rapid rise of refugees and migrants into their countries. Rather than simply play defense to the onslaught of people, they decided to change the thinking of people who might be tempted, out of fear or desperation, to flee their native lands.

For the EU, the focus was on Africa. For the US, the focus has been on Central America. The new response: more aid and assistance to address the root causes of the mass migration. As President Obama said last week at a global summit on migration, “If we truly want to address the crisis,... [w]e have to insist on greater investments in development and education and democratic institutions, the lack of which fuels so much of the instability we see in the world.”

The EU set up an “Emergency Trust Fund” targeted at 23 African countries. So far it has approved nearly $1 billion to improve security and promote job creation in those countries. The US, meanwhile, is spending $750 million in El Salvador, Honduras, and Guatemala, the main sources of migrants across the southwestern border. The three countries are promising $2 billion of their own money.

The EU has yet to report much progress for its spending, but the US, along with its Central American partners, has begun to see results. In Honduras and El Salvador, homicides are down this year. With US money and advice, each country is tackling the core criminality – corruption, drugs, and gangs – that lies behind a high rate of murders. In El Salvador, the government has made it difficult for convicted gang members to run operations from prison. It also set up methods to interdict the financial transactions of gangs. In Honduras, the government has reviewed all 14,000 police officers to find which ones are corrupt. About 40 percent were removed.

In Guatemala, meanwhile, anti-corruption efforts have been greatly increased – even felling a president – and the police and tax-enforcement agencies are being modernized. In all three countries, US aid is also targeted to boost private-sector job creation and integrate the economies of the three countries into a common market. The region needs to create 500,000 jobs a year to reduce a youth unemployment rate of about 30 percent.

Migration of Central Americans into the US has gone up this year, after dipping last year, but that may be caused by the belief that a wall-building Donald Trump might become president. The real effort to stem the migration from the region lies in reducing the fear and anguish. Both the EU and US need success in such efforts. The world migration crisis is too big to simply build more walls.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.