A jihadist’s cultural redemption

A former leader in an Al Qaeda affiliate admits guilt – and regret – in a world court for destroying ancient artifacts in Timbuktu, Mali. His advice to jihadists: Save all of humanity’s cherished culture rather than destroy it.

Ahmad al-Faqi al-Mahdi appears at the International Criminal Court in The Hague, Netherlands, August 22,at the start of his trial on charges of involvement in the destruction of historic mausoleums in Timbuktu during Mali's 2012 conflict.

In an age of violent jihadists trying to spread fear, it is worth noting when one turns away from them and shows unusual contrition. On Aug. 22 at the International Criminal Court (ICC) in The Hague, a former leader of an Al Qaeda affiliate pleaded guilty to destroying historic cultural and religious sites four years ago in the ancient city of Timbuktu in Mali.

The admission of guilt by Ahmad al-Faqi al-Mahdi and his coming prison sentence might alone send a message to violent jihadists, many of whom have wrecked ancient artifacts from Afghanistan to Libya. This was the first time an Islamist fighter has stood trial before the ICC, and it is also the first time any person has been charged by the court with a war crime for destroying cultural heritage. In 2012, Mr. Mahdi led the “Manners Brigade” of the militant group Ansar Dine that destroyed priceless medieval manuscripts and sacred mausoleums during an armed takeover of Timbuktu, once a major center of Islamic learning.

But Mahdi also used his court appearance to do more than admit he ran afoul of international law aimed at the protection of cultural heritage. He advised Muslims not to commit similar acts because it would not do “any good for humanity.”

In that comment he seemed to acknowledge the universal value of historic art and ancient cultural objects. His Islamic group had sought to eradicate artifacts they deemed pagan or heretical. Instead, he now suggests their purpose in uplifting people.

Much of the world’s cherished cultural and religious sites represent a common desire for self-reflection and an understanding of eternity. Certainly the 15th- and 16th-century works at Timbuktu fit this purpose. So did the Bamiyan Buddhas in Afghanistan, which were destroyed by the Taliban. And so did the Temple of Baalshamin in Palmyra, Syria, which was torn down by Islamic State.

“We live in a time when a 20-year-old can destroy a 2,000-year-old temple in the blink of an eye and distribute videos of the destruction worldwide,” says Karima Bennoune, the United Nations Special Rapporteur in the field of cultural rights. Yet now with this guilty plea at a world tribunal by a contrite former jihadist, perhaps that era may be near an end.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to A jihadist’s cultural redemption
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today