Echoes of Arab Spring in peace steps

A possible driver for cease-fires in Syria, Libya, and Yemen may be a high desire for freedom and equality among Arab youth. A new survey reveals their aspirations, five years since the Arab Spring.

AP Photo
Tunisian girls attend a rally to mark the fifth anniversary of the Arab Spring, Jan.14, 2016 in Tunis.

Five years after the Arab Spring, a 16-country survey has detected an undercurrent of hope among young Arabs in the Middle East. While the democratic uprisings of 2011 largely failed, and thousands have joined Islamic State (IS) or other militias, millions of young people still hold aspirations for freedom, opportunity, and equality.

Are those hopes now helping drive recent steps toward peace in Yemen, Libya, and Syria?

An overwhelming and rising majority of young Arabs ages 18 to 24 reject IS and its notion of a “caliphate,” according to the poll, conducted by US-based firm Penn Schoen Berland. But that is not the most interesting part. A majority say that those who join IS are impelled not by an extremist version of Islam but by a desire to escape joblessness and poor economies. (The Arab world has the globe’s highest unemployment rates.)

This insight should help reverse a common stereotype about the Middle East as wallowing in religious strife. Or as commentator Rami Khouri of Lebanon’s Daily Star puts it: “The easy and simplistic analysis one encounters across the world, especially in the United States, is that Arab lands are hopelessly caught in their own self-made sectarian wars waged by ethnic, national and religious communities that are unable to live together peacefully.”

The survey finds more than half of young Arabs say religion plays too big a role in public affairs. And despite their pessimism about prospects for democracy, two-thirds still want governments to improve personal freedoms and human rights.

Radical leaders cannot long ignore these youthful voices, which may explain the tentative successes of cease-fires in the region’s worst conflicts. But it also emphasizes a need to undercut extremist groups like IS by tackling the economic, social, and political problems in Arab societies. The promise of the Arab Spring has not gone away, the survey’s authors say. It is being expressed in new and necessary ways.

 

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.