Latin America’s sweeping anti-corruption broom

From Brazil to Mexico, a rising middle class is driving efforts to ensure honest governance, reflecting a global trend toward ‘ethical universalism.’

AP Photo
Demonstrators in Brazil fill Paulista Avenue during a protest demanding the impeachment of Brazil's President Dilma Rousseff March 13. The president faces impeachment proceedings over alleged fiscal mismanagement with the country in the throes of the worst recession in decades and amid a sprawling investigation into corruption at the state-run oil giant Petrobras.

In her latest book on corruption, “The Quest for Good Governance,” Berlin-based professor Alina Mungiu-Pippidi writes that the demand for honest and fair leaders has never been greater, especially since 2010 when social media really began to enable activists. It is not difficult to spot this trend in Latin America, a corner of the world where integrity in government was once least expected.

In the past three years, anti-corruption movements have turned politics upside down in Brazil, Mexico, and Guatemala. And to a degree, surprising election results in Argentina and Venezuela, driven in part by a popular desire for clean governance, have altered the course of those nations. These examples are ricocheting across Latin America’s 626 million people.

This crackdown on corruption, notes Americas Quarterly magazine, will be one of the region’s most important changes in the 21st century: “It will strengthen democracies. It will make the business world more transparent, and more open to new players.

“And it will help reduce poverty and inequality, as the billions of dollars lost to graft every year are redirected toward the neediest.”

Across Latin America, citizen expectations have risen in the past 20 years as democracy and economies have expanded. For the first time, the middle class now outnumbers those living in poverty, bringing demands for independent judiciaries and greater transparency and accountability.

People are also putting less faith in personal leaders and greater emphasis on systems of checks and balances. “Constitutions are more reliable than caudillos,” says Roger Noriega, a former US diplomat for the region.

Building a critical mass against corruption still remains difficult. Mexico passed important anti-graft laws last year, but the implementation of the measures seems stalled. Brazil has seen dozens of politicians and businesspeople caught up in a major scandal involving the state oil company, Petrobras, but with little structural change so far. In contrast, Guatemala’s anti-corruption efforts saw one president driven from office and a new one elected on a platform for clean governance.

Ms. Mungiu-Pippidi writes that societies where integrity is becoming the norm begin to embrace what she calls “ethical universalism.” Values such as honesty become well embedded, people share common purposes, voluntary groups work to better society, and civic engagement through media and the ballot box becomes stronger.

“The demand for good governance is on the rise,” she states, “but the capacity of long-term collective action in favor of new rules of the game is bound to vary greatly across these countries.” Latin America, perhaps more than any other region, is the place to watch this global shift toward honest governance.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.