Of democracy saviors and the people

A critical Nov. 8 election in Myanmar will provide a lesson for the world: that hopes for democracy should not be tied to one person (Aung San Suu Kyi) but should be embedded in the people and their demands for basic rights.

REUTERS
Myanmar pro-democracy leader Aung San Suu Kyi gives a speech during her campaign rally for the general elections Nov. 8

No longer isolated under a dictator’s thumb, Myanmar (Burma) will hold a critical election Nov. 8 that will move it closer to democracy. But the vote may also provide a lesson for the rest of the world.

The lesson could be this: A country’s democracy would be more secure if its celebrity advocate, in this case Aung San Suu Kyi, does not take power.

By definition, a democracy should be driven not by a single savior but by how well a people hold fast to basic principles, such as individual rights and equality before the law. South Africa still struggles to uphold basic freedoms long after Nelson Mandela jumped from democracy activist to being the first president of a multiracial electorate. Similar problems hold true in the Philippines, where Corazon Aquino led a democratic revolution in 1986 and then took power.

For nearly three decades, Ms. Aung San Suu Kyi has been the icon of democracy in Myanmar, especially in the eyes of foreigners if not everyone in her country. She received the Nobel Peace Prize for her efforts. Millions of Burmese place their hopes in her, the daughter of the country’s founder, Aung San. When she rose to prominence during anti-dictatorship protests in 1988, people swarmed to her, although she didn’t seek the role at first as an advocate..

While “the Lady,” as she is called, often warns that she is not “a wizard,” massive crowds come to her rallies, many with little understanding of what it takes to run a representative democracy. They tie a dream of democracy to a person. Her immense popularity convinces many not to act on their own to secure basic rights.

What’s more, the other advocates of democracy who question her decisions are seen as challenging her leadership. As a result, the country’s democracy movement has splintered, much to the benefit of the military.

In an odd way then, the military may have done Myanmar a favor by effectively banning her from becoming president (with the excuse that she has children who are foreigners). Her National League for Democracy may win a majority of the legislative seats allocated for civilians. But the military-written Constitution bars her from being the country’s leader.

Aung San Suu Kyi now insists that she will call the shots if her party wins – even if she does not become president. While she certainly deserves credit for her leadership, insights, and sacrifice during years of house arrest, she may want to assume the role of wise counselor rather than the power behind the throne. She would be an even greater hero by releasing power to others and spreading her legitimacy to elected representatives. Other countries on the path to democracy – and celebrity activists like her – would gain from her example.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.