Taproot for Europe's migrant crisis

The largest share of refugees streaming into Europe is from Syria. Solving the war there is as important as dealing with the symptom of Syrians crossing the Mediterranean to find peace.

A Syrian refugee carries a child upon their arrival by ship Athens, Greece, Aug. 24. Migrant arrivals in Greece have exceeded 160,000 this year, three times as high as in 2014.

The flow of migrants into Europe has tripled over the past year, reaching more than 340,000 in the first seven months of 2015. This sudden influx has created both a humanitarian and political crisis on the Continent. Yet as European countries struggle over their respective responsibilities as hosts, they must not be solely focused on what is really only a symptom. The long-term solution to this growing flight of desperate migrants requires that Europe, along with other nations, deal with its leading cause.

What is the leading cause? Most of the migrants arriving by boat have lately arrived more from the Middle East than from Africa, and the largest group is from Syria. Millions of Syrians have been stuck in camps in Turkey, Jordan, and Lebanon for as long as four years. Many more could soon decide to make the difficult trek to Europe. They have watched with despair as nearly a quarter million of their compatriots have been killed in a war waged on pro-democracy activists by the Syrian dictator, Bashar al-Assad. And more than a third of Syria is now controlled by Islamic State (IS), a jihadi militant group that has enslaved women and destroyed the antiquities of ancient civilizations.

No war should last for four years, especially one on this scale and whose effects now reach far beyond its borders – even to the point of migrants trying to enter the tunnel for the train from France to Britain. The international community has a good track record of coming together against many transnational problems – crime, terror, environmental threats, health crises. The Syrian refugee crisis demands a similar response.

Solving any Middle East problem can be difficult, given the strains over religion and between big powers. Yet the rising export of issues from Syria – refugees, the offshoots of IS, and the example set by Syria’s use of chemical weapons – should now help force an international compromise.

Negotiations to resolve Syria’s war have faltered since 2012, frustrating the best of diplomats. Yet as Turkey and the United States step up attacks on IS, and now that President Obama has struck a deal with Iran on its nuclear program, there has been a flurry of diplomatic feelers involving Russia, Iran, Saudi Arabia, and others to come up with a way to form a new government in Damascus.

On Aug. 17, the United Nations Security Council issued a statement calling for a “Syrian-led political process leading to a political transition.” The mechanism of any transition may not be easy. But with the EU facing the prospect of a further flow of Syrian migrants, it has a big incentive to take the lead in finding a diplomatic solution. Dealing with root causes rather than symptoms is always a smart move.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Taproot for Europe's migrant crisis
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today